请教一道题。 T-4-Q38

T-4-Q38

In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking ordinances, a petition entitled “Petition for Statewide Smoking Restriction” is being circulated to voters by campaign workers who ask only, “Do you want to sign a petition for statewide smoking restriction?” The petition advocates a state law banning smoking in most retail establishments and in government offices that are open to the public.

Which of the following circumstances would make the petition as circulated misleading to voters who understand the proposal as extending the local ordinances statewide?

A. Health costs associated with smoking cause health insurance premiums to rise for everyone and so affect nonsmokers.

B. In rural areas of the state, there are relatively few retail establishments and government offices that are open to the public.

C. The state law would supersede the local antismoking ordinances, which contain stronger bans than the state law does.

D. There is considerable sentiment among voters in most areas of the state for restriction of smoking.

E. The state law would not affect existing local ordinances banning smoking in places where the fire authorities have determined that smoking would constitute a fire hazard.

这题有争议

对于某些认为proposal是地方法律对州法律的延伸的人有误导

个人支持C：如果州法律没有地方法律严格，对这些人来说是有误导的

lawyer支持B：州法律的禁烟对象在整个州分布很少，是个花瓶禁令，中看不中用。

都有点道理，个人觉的C比较直接

谢谢 。。这种题的确有些让人恼火。。

可可：

在某一个国家，所有城市和大部分城镇都有反吸烟条例，一份请愿书，题为“全州吸烟限制建议书”正在分发给选民，竞选工作人员只问， “你想在建议限制州吸烟请愿书上签名的吗？ ”建议书主张法律禁止在向公众开放大部分零售单位和政府部门吸烟。
这在下列情况下，将误导选民， 理解这样的建议为，把本地法扩展到全州？

州法：禁止在向公众开放大部分零售单位和政府部门吸烟。
本地陈法：都有反吸烟条例

你想在建议限制州吸烟请愿书上签名的吗？

1，如果本地法全烟禁止， 哪些回答是的人， 反而放松了管制；选C;

B错， 农村少向公众开放大部分零售单位和政府部门， 州法就和他们不相干，无反作用。

误导， 就是其反作用， 削弱：

如果只是“YES”,  C中哪些要酷法的人反而得到了宽法！误导！

up