新GRE阅读理解36套--EX7 【求高手其原因】

jurat911 · 发表于 2012-3-2 16:39:25

The use of heat pumps has been held back
largely by skepticism about advertisers‘ claims that
heat pumps can provide as many as two units of
thermal energy for each unit of electrical energy
used, thus apparently contradicting the principle of
energy conservation.

Q: If the author‘s assessment of the use of heat pumps is
correct, which of the following best expresses the
lesson that advertisers should learn from this case?
(A) Do not make exaggerated claims about the
products you are trying to promote.
(B) Focus your advertising campaign on vague
analogies and veiled implications instead of
on facts.
(C) Do not use facts in your advertising that will
strain the prospective client‘s ability to
believe.
(D) Do not assume in your advertising that the
prospective clients know even the most
elementary scientific principles.
(E) Concentrate your advertising firmly on financially
relevant issues such as price discounts and
efficiency of operation.

我个人认为答案是D，可答案不是D。 why not D, why C ???? 求高手其原因

jurat911 · 发表于 2012-3-2 16:41:14

虽然这篇很短的，难度也不算大。我个人认为答案是D，可不是。 why not D, why C

adidadi · 发表于 2012-3-2 18:13:16

我也刚做了这题，跟你一样错。。。。
后来找到原题，是老GRE一篇长文章的首段和其中一道原题。
D错了因为clients是知道most elementary scientific principle--就是这个能量守恒定律，所以才会怀疑。
选C 。原题是后面的几段长文字解释了这个多出来的energy是为什么，大致是转换成evaporator了神马的。。。
要是考试真这么考，我可能排除法了。。。

jurat911 · 发表于 2012-3-2 22:09:23

good for you

[语文] 新GRE阅读理解36套--EX7 【求高手其原因】

所属分类: GRE考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()