ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 6073|回复: 12
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全299 请教

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-5-14 22:35:00 | 只看该作者

大全299 请教

Florida will gain another quarter-million jobs this year alone, many of them in high-paying fields like electronics and banking, making the state’s economy far more diversified than ten years ago.
(A) high-paying fields like electronics and banking, making the state’s economy far more diversified than
(B) high-paying fields like electronics and banking, and making the state’s economy far more diversified than its economy
(C) high-paying fields such as electronics and banking, to make the state’s economy far more diversified than
(D) such high-paying fields as electronics and banking, making the state’s economy far more diversified than it was
(E) such high-paying fields as electronics and banking, and make the state’s economy far more diversified than it was

想请问下making  and to make 在这个题目中的区别?也就是分词与不定式在这种成分时的区别?

沙发
发表于 2008-5-15 09:57:00 | 只看该作者

不定式表目的,现在分词表伴随,这两个东西一旦出现一般是不能互相替换的,而且c里的than前后比较对象也不对等。

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2008-5-16 16:35:00 | 只看该作者
这题不可以表示目的么,个人感觉好象可以诶,
地板
发表于 2008-5-16 22:12:00 | 只看该作者

    

选项C


    

Florida will gain another quarter-million jobs this year alone, many
of them in high-paying fields such as electronics and banking, to make the state's economy far more diversified than
ten years ago.

        


    

就句意推,找to make的动作发出者,由于many前后有逗号故是插入语,故to
make
是由Florida发出,变成Florida为了要多样化所以gain工作。


    

 


    

选项D


    

Florida will gain another quarter-million jobs this
year alone, many of them in such high-paying fields as electronics and banking,
making the state's economy far more diversified than it was
            
ten years ago.


    

to make改成making,可以清楚表示修饰前一句,讲一个因果关系,什么造成多样化?是许多在高薪领域的工作,many
of them
修饰前一句,然后making修饰many of them


    

 


    

Correct me if I am wrong


5#
 楼主| 发表于 2008-5-17 16:01:00 | 只看该作者
谢谢上面MM的回答,那MM的意思是to make 的主语一定要是具体的名词,不可以是前面的句子是波?也就是说to make不能修饰句子的?而making可以是波?
6#
发表于 2008-5-17 21:54:00 | 只看该作者
这一题或许类似OG的36:to不知道动作发出者是谁。

In 1527 King Henry
VIII sought to have his marriage to Queen Catherine annulled so as to he could marry Anne Boleyn. (X)

我想本题的to会引起问题,表目的的对象是谁?你读的时候觉得是前一个句子,我读的时候,会略过插入语去找。

有一个考题,我忘了是来源,正确句子还原之後如下,可以比照看看,观察 to V。通常句子会有一个动词 (have, gain, use..)再接一个to表目的。
如果是这个many
of them in high-paying fields such as electronics and banking 再接to,我会找不到动词,不知道动作,所以我往前找动词。

    

One of the earliest known birds with a beak and contour feathers, Confuciusornis
sanctus, had large clawlike “thumbs” on its wings, probably
to help
it climb up to a launching position for flight.



一起讨论
7#
 楼主| 发表于 2008-5-21 09:29:00 | 只看该作者
谢谢楼上MM回答,大家一起讨论
8#
发表于 2008-7-20 17:03:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用愁予在2008-5-15 9:57:00的发言:

不定式表目的,现在分词表伴随,这两个东西一旦出现一般是不能互相替换的,而且c里的than前后比较对象也不对等。

这也是我不明白的问题之一: than后面的it was为什么不能省略? 有没有什么情况下,是可以省略的?

精华里的比较之疱丁解牛篇里有这样的句子: Rice has protein of higher quality than usual/ever before/1000 years ago/people expected(状语比较)意义:米比通常/经往/多年前/人们预测/的蛋白质质量要高。

按照本题的逻辑, 是不是这样的句子也是错的, 应该改成: Rice has protein of higher quality than it did 1000 years ago?

请指教.

9#
发表于 2010-3-22 11:14:57 | 只看该作者
我也想知道it was为什么不能省呢 顶!
10#
发表于 2010-7-16 07:21:21 | 只看该作者
以下是引用愁予在2008-5-15 9:57:00的发言:
不定式表目的,现在分词表伴随,这两个东西一旦出现一般是不能互相替换的,而且c里的than前后比较对象也不对等。
这也是我不明白的问题之一: than后面的it was为什么不能省略? 有没有什么情况下,是可以省略的?
精华里的比较之疱丁解牛篇里有这样的句子: Rice has protein of higher quality than usual/ever before/1000 years ago/people expected(状语比较)意义:米比通常/经往/多年前/人们预测/的蛋白质质量要高。
按照本题的逻辑, 是不是这样的句子也是错的, 应该改成: Rice has protein of higher quality than it did 1000 years ago?
请指教.
-- by 会员 springsound (2008/7/20 17:03:00)



本题并不是状语比较,而是the state’s economy this yearthe state’s economy ten years ago的比较,如果省掉it was 会让人误以为是状语之间的比较
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-30 16:51
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部