SC JJ 65 discussion

chasingM7 · 发表于 2011-9-5 10:41:33

The government's expenditures of legal advice WERE higher than

1) what was budgeted
2) the sum that had been budgeted

尽早看到这个有点晕。大家觉得呢？我觉得budget是expenditure之前发生的，要用过去完成时态。但第一个what was budgeted 也挺顺口的。google了一下也有类似的表达。

AlohaDJ · 发表于 2011-9-5 10:53:42

1）中的was和were不一致，可以据此否掉吧。。因为what应该是expenditures
而且感觉what含义模糊，不如2）中的sum表达清晰。。
我会选2）

zhainiuniu · 发表于 2011-9-5 10:55:45

个人觉得2更准确，expenditures与sum平行。求拍砖。

qilu8989 · 发表于 2011-9-5 11:26:05

I think should use" had been budgeted"

Heather_Lau · 发表于 2011-9-5 11:35:08

1)主谓不一直吧,expenditures and was?
i prefer to 2)sum is clear and concise,had been is the correct tense.

lily0123 · 发表于 2011-9-5 11:36:56

支持2

SC JJ 65 discussion

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

浏览过的版块