This is an old LSAT question. A does not strengthen the conclusion. -- by 会员 sdcar2010 (2011/5/31 11:00:57)
A is irrelevant to the argument. Whether UV-B is the only type that can damage genes, it is still true that "Atmospheric ozone blocks UV-B, which can damage genes". A adds neither support nor oppostition to the argument. D rules out another factor that may contribute to the decline of amphibian population and therefore strengthens the argument. -- by 会员 kikisunflower (2011/5/31 10:50:13)
|