ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 4275|回复: 12
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG12 137新问 关于动词时态一致,请大家进来看看!!感激不尽!(已解决)

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-3-22 17:17:30 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Joachim Raff and Giacomo Meyerbeer are examples
of the kind of composer who receives popular acclaim
while living, often goes into decline after death, and
never regains popularity again.


(A) often goes into decline after death, and never
regains popularity again
(B) whose reputation declines after death and never
regains its status again
(C) but whose reputation declines after death and
never regains its former status
(D) who declines in reputation after death and who
never regained popularity again
(E) then has declined in reputation after death and
never regained popularity

答案 C
OG关于D的解释The verb tenses are inconsistent with present tense used in the first phrase;redundant again.
我觉得D如果把again去掉以后就是正确的。为什么要求D中的动词(declines, regained)与前面的动词(receives)一致呢?不同时态的动词也可以并列呀?


求各位大哥大姐帮帮忙,谢谢谢谢~~
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-3-22 19:09:33 | 只看该作者
我脚着在这个句子里三个动词的时态要一致,因为这句话陈述的是一个事实。
就算不是,regained也不对,因为它发生在declines后面,怎么能用过去时呢?
板凳
发表于 2011-3-22 19:43:21 | 只看该作者
为什么要求D中的动词(declines, regained)与前面的动词(receives)一致呢?不同时态的动词也可以并列呀?

我想这三个动词“receive”, "decline", "regain"虽然在结构上是并列关系,但在意思上是有一种承接的,即按照事情可能发生的先后组织语言的。如果 “receive”用的是一般现在时,没有理由regain用过去时
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2011-3-22 19:50:23 | 只看该作者
哈哈,‘我脚着’还是蛮搞得。
豁然开朗,谢谢
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-3-22 19:54:07 | 只看该作者
谢谢,讲的很清楚,一语中的,‘按照事情可能发生的先后组织语言的’ 我当时还没想到呢,以后还要多多注意才行
6#
发表于 2011-3-22 20:06:55 | 只看该作者
按时间顺序叙述比较清晰
7#
发表于 2011-3-23 09:19:32 | 只看该作者
同一题,想请问C中后面那个its是怎么指代的呀???
8#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-3-23 09:43:03 | 只看该作者
C.   but whose reputation declines after death and
      never regains its former status



its应该指代reputation吧,but后面的从句都是讲reputation怎么样的,如OG解释:
As written, with who as the subject of goes and regains, the last two descriptions illogically continue to refer to the kind of composer.Logically it must be the reputation that declines after the composers death.
9#
发表于 2011-3-23 10:20:04 | 只看该作者
C.   but whose reputation declines after death and
      never regains its former status



its应该指代reputation吧,but后面的从句都是讲reputation怎么样的,如OG解释:
As written, with who as the subject of goes and regains, the last two descriptions illogically continue to refer to the kind of composer.Logically it must be the reputation that declines after the composers death.
-- by 会员 avernus (2011/3/23 9:43:03)



荣誉的地位么???不是应该是"人"的地位回不到从前了么?
10#
发表于 2011-3-23 18:30:42 | 只看该作者
顶起
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-27 12:21
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部