ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2056|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求助!OG86题~~

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-11-3 23:18:32 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
86. In 2000, a mere two dozen products accounted for half the increase in spending on prescription drugs,a phenomenon that is explained not just because of more expensive drugs but by the fact that doctors are writingmany more prescriptions for higher-cost drugs.



(A) a phenomenon that is explained not just because of more expensive drugs but by the fact that doctors are writing



(B) a phenomenon that is explained not just by the fact that drugs are becoming more expensive but also by the fact that doctors are writing



(C) a phenomenon occurring not just because of drugs that are becoming more expensive but because of doctors having also written



(D) which occurred not just because drugs are becoming more expensive but doctors are also writing



(E) which occurred not just because of more expensive drugs but because doctors have also written

正确答案为B
OG原版解释节选如下:

C The phrasingdrugs that are becominganddoctors having also writtenare awkward and confusing; the placement ofalsois incorrect.
E The placement ofalsois incorrect; the structure of the sentence is not parallel.

想问一下,not only...but also中,but 和also 什么情况下可以被隔开?

谢谢!





E The placement ofalsois incorrect; the structure of the sentence is not parallel.

想问一下,not only...but also中,but 和also 什么情况下可以被隔开?

谢谢!



收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2012-11-3 23:23:35 | 只看该作者
最后的这几句不知道怎么搞的重复了,忽略吧:
E The placement ofalsois incorrect; the structure of the sentence is not parallel.

想问一下,not only...but also中,but 和also 什么情况下可以被隔开?

谢谢!
板凳
发表于 2012-11-4 09:58:56 | 只看该作者
not only... but also..
争创语序不会把but和also隔开吧,不过会有省略also的情况
倒装语序里面,not only放句首,会有but also隔开的情况

C选项可以从语义上理解also的位置 because of doctors having also written
also在written前面,感觉好像doctors除了written还做了别的事情,但是句子里并没有说doctor干别的事

but also 是可以以单独使用的,表示转折
地板
发表于 2012-11-4 18:25:58 | 只看该作者
找到了几个句子,LZ看看吧~
大全125
The winds that howl across the Great Plains not only blow away valuable topsoil, thereby reducing the potential crop yield of a tract of land, and also damage or destroy young plants.
and also damage or destroy
as well as damaging or destroying
but they also cause damage or destroy
but also damage or destroy(D)
but also causing damage or destroying
Choice D, the best answer, correctly employs the correlative construction not only x but also y, where x and y are grammatically parallel and where both x and y (damage and destroy) apply to young plants. Choices A, (not only... and also), B (not only... as well as), and C (not only... but they also) violate the not only... but also paradigm. Moreover, B contains terms (blow... damaging) that are not parallel. In C and E, damage is used not as a verb with young plants as its direct object but as a noun receiving the action of cause; consequently, these choices fail to state explicitly that the damage is done to young plants. E also violates parallelism (not only blow... but also causing)

354.In 1978 a national study found that not only had many contractors licensed by a self-policing private guild failed to pass qualifying exams, they in addition falsified their references.
they in addition falsified their references
they had their references falsified in addition
but they had also falsified their references (C)
they had also falsified their references
but their references were falsified as well
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-11-12 08:17:44 | 只看该作者
解答的太好了~谢谢~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-24 01:29
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部