求助 gwd-31-10

The Hyksos invaded the Nile Delta, of Egypt and ruled it from 1650 B.C.

Their origin is uncertain, but archaeologists hypothesize that they were Canaanites.

In support of this hypothesis, the archaeologists point out that excavations of Avans,

The Hyksos capital in Egypt, have uncovered large numbers of artifacts virtually

Identical to artifacts produced in Ashkelon, and Ashkelon was a majkor city of

Canaan at the time of the Hyksos’ invasion.

In order to evaluate the force of the archaeologists. Evidence ,it would

Useful to determine which of the following ?

1)      whether artifacts from Ashkelon were widely traded to non-Canaanite cities

2)      Whether significant numbers of artifacts that do not resemble artifacts

produced in Ashkelon have been found at Avaris

3)      Whether Avaris was the nearest Hyksos city in Egypt to Canaan

4)      Whether Ashkelon after 1550 B.C.continued to produce artifacts similar to whose

found at Avaris

5)      whether any artifacts produced by the Hyksos after 1550 B.C .have been

found in Egypt

这个题连题目都看不太明白,哪位大侠能解释下，不甚感激！

The Hyksos invaded the Nile Delta, of Egypt and ruled it from 1650 B.C.Their origin is uncertain, but archaeologists hypothesize that they were Canaanites.In support of this hypothesis, the archaeologists point out that excavations of Avans,The Hyksos capital in Egypt, have uncovered large numbers of artifacts virtually Identical to artifacts produced in Ashkelon, and Ashkelon was a majkor city of Canaan at the time of the Hyksos’ invasion.

意思是说:h人在1650bc就侵占了埃及，并统治了那里。但是h人的发源地并不知道。但是现在人们猜想，和h人是c人的后裔。因为h人在埃及的遗物和c人建造的东西有共同处。

    逻辑就是：因为两者相似，所以c是h的祖先。

我选a哈。如果这些东西就贸易过去的，那祖先的说法就错。如果这些东西不是贸易过去的，而是h人自己造的，那么很有可能c就是H的祖先