ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

In a blow to those who still harbored the illusion that E-mail exchanges are private, a watchdog group recently uncovered a trick for enabling an interloper to rig an E-mail message so that this person will be privy to any comments that a recipient had added as the message is forwarded to others or sent back and forth.

正确答案: D

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2212|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

老prep2-82 题,愁的我头发都掉了~~求大牛解释~~

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-4-20 20:24:32 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
82.(28855-!-item-!-188;#058&004055)











In a blow to those who still harbored the illusion that E-mail exchanges are private, a watchdog group recently uncovered a trick for enabling an interloper to rig an E-mail message so that this person will be privy to any comments that a recipient had added as the message is forwarded to others or sent back and forth.




(A) who still harbored the illusion that E-mail exchanges are private, a watchdog group recently uncovered a trick for enabling an interloper to rig an E-mail message so that this person will be privy to any comments that a recipient had added



(B) who had still been harboring the illusion that E-mail exchanges are private, a watchdog group recently uncovered a trick for enabling an interloper to rig an E-mail message so that this person was privy to any comments that a recipient might have added



(C) who still were harboring the illusion that E-mail exchanges are private, a watchdog group recently uncovered a trick enabling an interloper to rig an E-mail message so that this person is privy to any comments that a recipient would add



(D) still harboring the illusion that E-mail exchanges are private, a watchdog group recently uncovered a trick that enables an interloper to rig an E-mail message so that this person will be privy to any comments that a recipient might add

(E) still harboring the illusion that E-mail exchanges had been private, a watchdog group recently uncovered a trick that will enable an interloper to rig an E-mail message so that this person was privy to any comments that a recipient might add

我选的C,prep笔记里说who still were 应该被省去,为什么啊~~those who读上去好顺啊。。。还有后半句实在不理解意思。。。求解释啊~~~~~

收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2012-4-20 20:44:29 | 只看该作者
自己顶~~~~up
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2012-4-20 21:36:12 | 只看该作者
地板
发表于 2012-4-20 23:23:25 | 只看该作者
生词汇太多了。。。
those后面的修饰语说的是那些(those)沉浸在对邮箱交流是私人的幻想中的人。
并不是说“过去沉浸,现在不沉浸”的人,而是说,一直沉浸在幻像中的人,是不是该工现在分词呀
后面的意思不重要,大体说一个杀毒软件?还是什么的发现了一些黑客用钓鱼软件做坏事,看懂enable就行了
5#
发表于 2012-4-22 20:33:47 | 只看该作者
个人认为:
1:本句子意思:为了让那些以为用E-mail交换信息很安全的人认识到这是个幻想,一个调查组最近揭发了一个手法,这个手法可以让信息偷窥者操纵 E-mail 信息,这样信息偷窥者就可以在信息输入人在发送给他人或收到他人回信的过程中获得这些信息。

2:A、B选项中for enabling 是错误的表达,此处用状语修饰trick,再说就算是表达目的也应该用to enable。E选项中will do的时态错误。C选项中,前半句中没有表达过去一直在进行的意思,所以不用those who were。。。。。而正确选项D则用了分词来对those进行修饰说明,其他部分也正确,故选D。
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-4-22 23:40:16 | 只看该作者
很清楚哦~~~谢谢·~~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-30 06:15
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部