ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 4575|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

很重要的题!大家来看看帮忙解释下~!对自己也有帮助

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-5-27 22:43:25 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
45. (26929-!-item-!-188;#058&003015)

(The application of a new method for analyzing the chemistry of tooth enamel allows scientists to
examine molars of prehuman ancestors and determining) that their diets were more varied than had
been supposed.

(A) The application of a new method for analyzing the chemistry of tooth enamel allows scientists to
examine molars of prehuman ancestors and determining
(B) Through the application of a new method for analyzing the chemistry of tooth enamel, the
molars of prehuman ancestors were examined by scientists who determined
(C) When they applied a new method for analyzing the chemistry of tooth enamel, scientists
examined molars of prehuman ancestors, determining
(D) Applying a new method for analyzing the chemistry of tooth enamel, the molars of prehuman
ancestors have been examined by scientists, who determined
(E) Applying a new method for analyzing the chemistry of tooth enamel, scientists have examined
molars of prehuman ancestors and determined
答案是e选项,我想问一下,b选项不存在逻辑主语不恰当的问题吧! 因为 application 是名词,不存在前后主语不一致的问题吧? 还有e选项的时态有问题吧! 伴随状语表示同时发生,主句又是完成时,不太恰当吧!我还想问一下,determined前面的have 是不是省略了?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-5-27 22:49:34 | 只看该作者
B當然有邏輯主語歧義的問題阿
by scientists who determined that their diets。。。
這裡their不就也能指代scientists而非ancestors了嗎?
B選項中 application 不是句子的主語,主語是 ancestors
而且被動be examed 不好 被動時態大多數情況下都是不簡潔的
最後 have是省略了
板凳
发表于 2010-5-27 23:59:52 | 只看该作者
45. (26929-!-item-!-188;#058&003015)

(The application of a new method for analyzing the chemistry of tooth enamel allows scientists to
examine molars of prehuman ancestors and determining) that their diets were more varied than had
been supposed.

(A) The application of a new method for analyzing the chemistry of tooth enamel allows scientists to
examine molars of prehuman ancestors and determining
(B) Through the application of a new method for analyzing the chemistry of tooth enamel, the
molars of prehuman ancestors were examined by scientists who determined
(C) When they applied a new method for analyzing the chemistry of tooth enamel, scientists
examined molars of prehuman ancestors, determining
(D) Applying a new method for analyzing the chemistry of tooth enamel, the molars of prehuman
ancestors have been examined by scientists, who determined
(E) Applying a new method for analyzing the chemistry of tooth enamel, scientists have examined
molars of prehuman ancestors and determined
答案是e选项,我想问一下,b选项不存在逻辑主语不恰当的问题吧! 因为 application 是名词,不存在前后主语不一致的问题吧? 还有e选项的时态有问题吧! 伴随状语表示同时发生,主句又是完成时,不太恰当吧!我还想问一下,determined前面的have 是不是省略了?
-- by 会员 zxtcomeo (2010/5/27 22:43:25)



关于时态我是这样理解的:首先未划线部分中时态正确,suppose先发生,用had。然后划线部分是说通过使用新技术,科学家化验并作出结论。。。,这个动作一定发生在被研究内容发生的动作之后,即their diets were more varied
所以三个动作体现时间先后,说得通
而且个人感觉好像很少有题可以准确用时态作判断,还是纠其他的错比较保险
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2010-5-28 23:49:21 | 只看该作者
45. (26929-!-item-!-188;#058&003015)

(The application of a new method for analyzing the chemistry of tooth enamel allows scientists to
examine molars of prehuman ancestors and determining) that their diets were more varied than had
been supposed.

(A) The application of a new method for analyzing the chemistry of tooth enamel allows scientists to
examine molars of prehuman ancestors and determining
(B) Through the application of a new method for analyzing the chemistry of tooth enamel, the
molars of prehuman ancestors were examined by scientists who determined
(C) When they applied a new method for analyzing the chemistry of tooth enamel, scientists
examined molars of prehuman ancestors, determining
(D) Applying a new method for analyzing the chemistry of tooth enamel, the molars of prehuman
ancestors have been examined by scientists, who determined
(E) Applying a new method for analyzing the chemistry of tooth enamel, scientists have examined
molars of prehuman ancestors and determined
答案是e选项,我想问一下,b选项不存在逻辑主语不恰当的问题吧! 因为 application 是名词,不存在前后主语不一致的问题吧? 还有e选项的时态有问题吧! 伴随状语表示同时发生,主句又是完成时,不太恰当吧!我还想问一下,determined前面的have 是不是省略了?
-- by 会员 zxtcomeo (2010/5/27 22:43:25)




关于时态我是这样理解的:首先未划线部分中时态正确,suppose先发生,用had。然后划线部分是说通过使用新技术,科学家化验并作出结论。。。,这个动作一定发生在被研究内容发生的动作之后,即their diets were more varied
所以三个动作体现时间先后,说得通
而且个人感觉好像很少有题可以准确用时态作判断,还是纠其他的错比较保险
-- by 会员 shalinzz (2010/5/27 23:59:52)


伴随状语表示同时发生呀!如果是两个从句,可以用过去完成时来表示动作先于另一个从句的动作?但是伴随应该不一样吧?或者说伴随并不一定表示同时发生?这里用过去完成时没意义
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-24 06:07
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部