ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1338|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG11 54th 答案有误? 紧急求助,谢谢大虾

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-5-29 10:59:00 | 只看该作者

OG11 54th 答案有误? 紧急求助,谢谢大虾

答案是E,但是最后的will be allowed...的主语是什么? 是farmers嘛? 但是farmers和grain之间怎么没有空格或者没有连接词?

有谁可以解读该句子的结构???

沙发
发表于 2008-5-29 11:14:00 | 只看该作者

MM下次记得把题目贴出来哦

54.   When Congress reconvenes, some newly elected members from rural states will try and establish tighter restrictions for the amount of grain farmers are to be allowed to grow and to encourage more aggressive sales of United States farm products overseas.

(A) and establish tighter restrictions for the amount of grain farmers are to be allowed to grow and to encourage

(B) and establish tighter restrictions on the amount of grain able to be grown by farmers and encouraging

(C) establishing tighter restrictions for the amount of grain farmers are allowed to grow and to encourage

(D) to establish tighter restrictions on the amount of grain capable of being grown by farmers and encouraging

(E) to establish tighter restrictions on the amount of grain (that) farmers will be allowed to grow and to encourage

Idiom

This sentence requires attention to the small, linking words so often overlooked. When will try is used with another verb to show purpose or intent, the correct expression is will by to, not will try and. The correct preposition following restrictions is not for but on. Are to be allowed to grow is wordy; the infinitive to be should be omitted for a tighter and clearer expression.

A     To, indicating purpose, should replace and before establish; restrictions is incorrectly followed by for rather than on; to be is wordy and should be omitted

B      And before establish does not show purpose; the passive voice able to be grown by is weak and wordy; the constructions and establish ... and encouraging ... are not parallel

C     Will by establishing does not show intent or purpose; restrictions must be followed by on, not for, parallelism is lost

D     Passive voice construction capable of being grown by is weak and wordy; encouraging and to establish, are not parallel

E      Correct. To establish indicates purpose and parallels to encourage; restrictions is correctly followed by on; the wordiness of the verb phrase has been eliminated.

The correct answer is E.


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-5-29 20:58:28编辑过]
板凳
发表于 2008-5-29 19:09:00 | 只看该作者

怎么觉得楼上说的有问题。如果是farmers who+定从,who没法省。再说grain farmers在这里逻辑上没有任何修饰关系,原句intended meaning是restrictions on the amount of grain, not the amount of grain farmers

两个名词放一起,没有修饰关系,要么就是同位语,但这里明显不是。

感觉是定语从句省略了引导词that,不过不是修饰farmers,是修grains

(e)to establish tighter restrictions on the amount of grain that farmers will be allowed to grow and encourage

定从引导词在从句中做宾语,可省略。

地板
发表于 2008-5-29 20:58:00 | 只看该作者
楼上的MM说的是对的,应该是that修饰grain
5#
发表于 2008-7-2 04:46:00 | 只看该作者

同意3楼的说法,amount修饰不可数名词(grain),所以可以看出来amount of grain后面省略了that,不可能是amount of grain farmers。

e)  to establish tighter restrictions on the amount of grain (that) farmers will be allowed to grow and encourage   

6#
发表于 2009-9-9 11:10:00 | 只看该作者

不知道NEWLIFE2009是否看明白了, 我同意楼上说的。

 我的理解是;When Congress reconvenes, some newly elected members from rural states will try to
                establish tighter restrictions on the amount of grain(that) farmers are allowed to grow and to encourage
more aggressive sales of United States farm products overseas.

   整个句子的结构是 members try to establish ........ and to encourage.......

                                       farmers are allowed to grow 是grain 的定语从句,因为grain是grow 的宾语,可以省略that.

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-30 05:54
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部