请教ＯＧ１３０

130. In a 5-to-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled（裁定） that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians for the unlawful seizure of their ancestral lands in the eighteenth century.

(A)  that two upstate New York counties owed resti­tution to three tribes of Oneida Indians for the unlawful seizure of

(B)  that two upstate New York counties owed resti­tution to three tribes of Oneida Indians because of their unlawful seizure of

(C)  two upstate New York counties to owe restitu­tion to three tribes of Oneida Indians for their unlawful seizure of

(D)  on two upstate New York counties that owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians because they unlawfully seized

(E)   on the restitution that two upstate New York counties owed to three tribes of Oneida Indians for the unlawful seizure of

答案选Ａ，哪位能帮忙翻译一下啊，不是很理解．答案中说ＢＣＤ中的复数形式不对，我也不太明白

在一個五票對四票的決議中，最高法院裁定上紐約州的兩個郡必須將十八世紀時非法侵占三個印弟安部落祖先的土地歸還給印弟安人。

由於 rule後面要加　that ，所以就是AB選一個，但B中的their不知是指誰（可能是三個部落也可能是兩個郡），基於代名詞必須指涉清楚的原則，棄B選A

多谢！＾＿＾

btw，是不是没有rule　sb　to　do　sth的说法？

整個英文表達習慣都是常用與不常用的情況構成的，也就是說rule多接 that, 或是over ，那麼就得儘量優先選擇這種句子，但若是這些選項都沒有，沒有 that 也沒有 over , 那麼或許 rule sb to do sth也可以被接受，這都是相對的關係。

欠