ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1344|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

一道ff逻辑 帮忙啊 10几号就考了

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-12-5 20:14:00 | 只看该作者

一道ff逻辑 帮忙啊 10几号就考了

41. Raymond Burr played the role of lawyer Perry Mason on television. Burr’s death in 1993 prompted a prominent lawyer to say “Although not a lawyer, Mr. Burr strove for such authenticity that we feel as if we lost one of our own.” This comment from a prestigious attorney provides appalling evidence that, in the face of television, even some legal professionals are losing their ability to distinguish fiction from reality.

 

The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument

 

A.       takes the views of one lawyer to represent the views of all lawyers

B.        criticizes the lawyer rather than the lawyer’s statement

C.        presumes that the lawyer is qualified to evaluate the performance of an actor

D.       focuses on a famous actor’s portrayal of a lawyer rather than on the usual way in which lawyers are portrayed on television

E.        ignores the part of the lawyer’s remark that indicates an awareness of the difference between reality and fiction

为什么答案是E??????????

沙发
发表于 2008-12-5 21:00:00 | 只看该作者
因为“as if” 吧
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2008-12-5 21:10:00 | 只看该作者
哦 好怪异 谢谢哦
地板
发表于 2008-12-6 03:58:00 | 只看该作者

某个在电视上演律师的人死了,某个很有名的律师说:“尽管他不是律师,但是他演得那么努力那么好,让我们觉得好像真的是失去了我们中的某个人。”(言下之意是,此人演技好,让人觉得他就是一个真正的律师。)

原文的augument是:这么有名的律师都能做出这样的评价,说明在面对电视的时候,有的法律专家也失去了辨别小说和现实的能力。

这里明显的问题是,说话的律师已经表明他知道是小说不是现实(Although not a lawyer),后面还要说人家不能分辨小说和现实。就是E了。

5#
 楼主| 发表于 2008-12-6 08:39:00 | 只看该作者
哦 讲得太好了 嘿嘿 请问你考试了么
6#
发表于 2008-12-7 06:51:00 | 只看该作者
我以前考过,这次还没考,这段时间在专啃逻辑。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-30 23:56
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部