GWD 8- 9 全文如下。我不太懂美国政权结构,上网查了一下还是不太明白。所以下面文章里面的内容看得挺晕,到底是谁和谁在斗争?特别是黄色部分,senate不是HOUSE的两部分之一吗?为什么我看文章的意思是它们是分开的,或者至少house>senate啊?没看明白其中起承转合是怎么回事。 请牛人帮忙讲讲。谢谢!
In its 1903 decision in the case of Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock, the United States Supreme Court rejected the Line efforts of three Native American tribes (5) to prevent the opening of tribal lands to non-Indian settlement without tribal consent. In his study of the Lone Wolf case, Blue Clark properly emphasizes the Court’s assertion (10) of a virtually unlimited unilateral power of Congress (the House of Represen- tatives and the Senate) over Native American affairs. But he fails to note the decision’s more far-reaching (15) impact: shortly after Lone Wolf, the federal government totally abandoned negotiation and execution of formal written agreements with Indian tribes as a prerequisite for the implemen- (20) tation of federal Indian policy. Many commentators believe that this change had already occurred in 1871 when— following a dispute between the House and the Senate over which (25) chamber should enjoy primacy in Indian affairs—Congress abolished the making of treaties with Native American tribes. But in reality the federal government continued to nego- (30) tiate formal tribal agreements past the turn of the century, treating these documents not as treaties with sover- eign nations requiring ratification by the Senate but simply as legislation to be (35) passed by both houses of Congress. The Lone Wolf decision ended this era of formal negotiation and finally did away with what had increasingly become the empty formality of obtain- ing tribal consent.
|