ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1709|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

哪位大虾帮忙看看这题.高人指点啊

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-9-4 20:08:57 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Teenagers are oftern priced out of the labor market by the government-mandated minimum-wage level because emplyers cannot afford to pay that much for extra help. Therefore, if Congress institutes a subminimum wage, a new lower legal wage for teenagers, the teenage unemployment rate, which has been rising rising since 1960, will no longer increase.

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument above?

A Since 1960 the teenage unemployment rate has risen when the minimum was has risen.

B Since 1960 the teenage unemployment rate has risen even when the minimum wage remained constant.

C Employrs often hire extra help during holiday nd warm weather seasons.

D The teenage unemployment rate rose mre quickly in the 1970's than it did in the 1960's

E The teenage unemployment rate has occasionally declined in the years since 1960

我选了E但是答案是B,我怎么都想不明白啊....

请哪位高人指点
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2011-9-5 16:34:10 | 只看该作者
咋没有人回呀,难道真的是难题?
板凳
发表于 2011-9-6 14:44:37 | 只看该作者
E选项有occasionally,偶尔不等于全局,不能削弱结论的。
B可以理解为有因无果的削弱,工资不变不能导致失业下降。这个因和结论的因不一致,其实,但是用排除法也只能选它了。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-29 21:57
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部