|
Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Morocco was also of interest to the French throughout the first half of the twentieth century because they assumed that if they did not hold it, their grip on Algeria was always insecure. (A) if they did not hold it, their grip on Algeria was always insecure (B) without it their grip on Algeria would never be secure (C) their grip on Algeria was not ever secure if they did not hold it (D) without that, they could never be secure about their grip on Algeria (E) never would their grip on Algeria be secure if they did not hold it
答案选C，是由于if条件从句的问题，这个理由我很赞同。但是C里面，将原题的always insecure--》not ever secure ，虽然意思也差不多，但是好么？
另外，关于条件从句，我的总结（白勇说的）怎么跟有一道题目有冲突呢？也请教一下。 | 与现在事实相反：从句的谓语动词用过去时（be一律用were），主句用should（一）/would（二、三）/could/might+动词原形 | | 与过去事实相反：从句的谓语动词用had+过去分词，主句用should（一）/would（二、三）/could/might+have+动词原形 | | 与将来事实相反：从句的谓语动词用should+动词原形，主句用should（一）/would（二、三）/could/might+动词原形 |
Rising inventories, when unaccompanied correspondingly by increases in sales, can lead to production cutbacks that would hamper economic growth. (A) when unaccompanied correspondingly by increases in sales, can lead (B) when not accompanied by corresponding increases in sales, possibly leads (C) when they were unaccompanied by corresponding sales increases, can lead (D) if not accompanied by correspondingly increased sales, possibly leads (E) if not accompanied by corresponding increases in sales, can lead 答案选E，可是E怎么用can不用could呢？
[此贴子已经被作者于2008-3-16 5:50:10编辑过] | 
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2008-3-16 05:33:00
