|
og:the if clause in B must take should rather than would 为什么？
73. The British Admiralty and the War Office met in March 1892 to consider a possible Russian attempt to seize Constantinople and how they would have to act militarily to deal with them.
(A) how they would have to act militarily to deal with them
(B) how to deal with them if military action would be necessary
(C)what would be necessary militarily for dealing with such an event
(D) what military action would be necessary in order to deal with such an event
(E) the necessity of what kind of military action in order to take for dealing with it
In choices A and B, the pronoun them has no antecedent; furthermore, the if clause in B must take should rather than would (虚拟语气). In C, necessary militarily is awkward and vague (不如D表达的清晰). E is wordy and garbles the meaning with incorrect word order. Choice D is best: its phrasing is clear, grammatical, and idiomatic. Moreover, D is the choice that most closely parallels the construction of the nonunderlined portion of the sentence. The sentence states that the Admiralty and the War Office met to consider x and y, where x is the noun phrase a possible Russian attempt. D provides a noun phrase, military action, that matches the structure of x more closely than do the corresponding noun elements in the other choices. 通常一个概括性的名词要比代词清晰的多（这往往成为正确答案的标志） | 
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2004-8-29 23:55:00
楼主
