ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Some scientists have been critical of the laboratory tests conducted by the Federal Drug Administration on the grounds that the amounts of suspected carcinogens fed to animals far exceeds those that humans could consume

正确答案: E

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 1529|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG 243,扶持一下,我分不清动词的单复数

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-11-26 01:54:00 | 只看该作者

OG 243,扶持一下,我分不清动词的单复数

243. Some scientists have been critical of the laboratory tests conducted by the Federal Drug Administration on the grounds that the amounts of suspected carcinogens fed to animals far exceeds those that humans could consume.


(A)  far exceeds those that humans could consume


(B)  exceeds by far those humans can consume


(C)  far exceeds those humans are able to consume


(D)  exceed by far those able to be consumed by humans


(E)   far exceed those that humans could consume


我选得是a,可是og的解释是exceed是复数,exceeds是单数,我不明白,那位能指点一下?

沙发
发表于 2005-11-26 13:35:00 | 只看该作者
og的意思是exceed的主语是复数,而exceeds的主语是单数,所以the amounts 是复数,应该用exceed.
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2005-11-27 11:55:00 | 只看该作者
明白了。感谢斑竹!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-24 03:06
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部