- UID
- 1437778
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2020-1-3
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
In 2000, a mere two dozen products accounted for half the increase in spending on prescription drugs, a phenomenon that is explained not just because of more expensive drugs but by the fact that doctors are writing many more prescriptions for higher-cost drugs.
- Aa phenomenon that is explained not just because of more expensive drugs but by the fact that doctors are writing
- Ba phenomenon that is explained not just by the fact that drugs are becoming more expensive but also by the fact that doctors are writing
- Ca phenomenon occurring not just because of drugs that are becoming more expensive but because of doctors having also written
- Dwhich occurred not just because drugs are becoming more expensive but doctors are also writing
- Ewhich occurred not just because of more expensive drugs but because doctors have also written
关于这道题目,我看了不少的解析,还是有几点疑惑。
1.关于c选项的n+having done据说看到这个就是必错,我想知道现在完成时态的一些知识点,总感觉没有太大的语法错误。不就是指代这个doctoor开高价格处方药物在的动作发生在过去嘛。
2.这个也是我最大的问题,我其实觉得D没有问题,听elly老师网课讲的是which在GMAC出题组里面是不做修饰一句话来讲的。美国很少有人用which修饰一句话,GMAC也不会出这样的考点(2017年的课),但是我在cd搜了一下,的确有非限制性定语从句类似的考点出现。所以到底正确的说法是什么,我有点懵逼。如果which作为非限制性定语从句来说的话,我觉得这句话没有太大的问题。唯一的问题在于定语从句=...的....,重点在于被修饰的对象,which后只是补充说明,非同等重要。但是同位语说明,两个互为同位语的成分,互相补充,同等重要。
这是我唯一的理解了,希望有大佬解答,为这个题画上句号。
|
|