OG-12-102题，这答案真是太牵强了！求人指点！

做逻辑做得很不顺，难道OG是越到后面越难，觉得好多非要看答案才明白。。。这个我是看了还不明白！！
102. Theater critic: The play La Finestrina, now at the Central Theater, was written in Italy in the 18th century.The director claims that this production is as similar to the original production as is possible in a modern theater.Although the actor who plays Harlequin the clown gives a performance very reminiscent of the 20th century American comedian Groucho Marx, Marx's comic style was very much within the comic acting tradition that had begun in 16th century Italy.
The considerations given best serve as part of an argument that


D. the performance of the actor who plays Harle quin in La Finestrna does not serve as evidence against the director's claim

答案就是这个D选项了,我不明白既然这个演员的表演是和另一个具有从意大利16世纪开始出现的表演传统的演员有相同的风格，那就是说这个演员也是意大利16世纪的那种风格啊，而导演说的是这出戏已经是现在戏剧里最接近原作的，而原作是产生于18世纪，难道说从16世纪开始的表演传统是和18世纪一样的吗？所以不能用作反对导演的话，我觉得这么明显的时间不一样，明显是说导演说的那句话应该被反驳吧，真是不懂！

我也觉得答案解释的很牵强，我自己的理解是导演说这个play最大程度上忠实了18世纪原著。虽然演H的演员的表演会让人想起GM,一个20世纪的喜剧演员（这里是一个evidence against the director's claim,因为20世纪说明不similar to the original production),但是最后又转折了，说M的喜剧风格实际上16世纪就出现了（也就是说确实是similar to the original production，所以这个表演并不能作为反驳导演的证据)
但是唯一想不通的是为什么要拿16世纪来和18世纪作比较