ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2783|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求助!PREP2012-Pack1-RC-008求帮忙翻译一句话

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2013-8-7 21:06:25 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
文章:
Over the last 150 years, large stretches of salmon habitat have been eliminated by human activity: mining, livestock grazing, timber harvesting, and agriculture as well as recreational and urban development. The numerical effect is obvious: there are fewer salmon in degraded regions than in pristine ones; however, habitat loss also has the potential to reduce genetic diversity. This is most evident in cases where it results in the extinction of entire salmon populations. Indeed, most analysts believe that some kind of environmental degradation underlies the demise of many extinct salmon populations. Although some rivers have beenrecolonized, the unique genes of the original populations have been lost.
Large-scale disturbances in one locale also have the potential to alter the genetic structure of populations in neighboring areas, even if those areas have pristine habitats. Why? Although the homing instinct of salmon to their natal stream is strong, a fraction of the fish returning from the sea (rarely more than 15 percent) stray and spawn in nearby streams. Low levels of straying are crucial, since the process provides a source of novel genes and a mechanism by which a location can be repopulates should the fish there disappear. Yet high rates of straying can be problematic because misdirected fish may interbreed with the existing stock to such a degree that any local adaptations that are present become diluted. Straying rates remain relatively low when environmental conditions are stable, but can increase dramatically when streams suffer severe disturbance. The 1980 volcanic eruption of Mount Saint Helens, for example, sent mud and debris into several tributaries of the Columbia River. For the next couple of years, steelhead trout (a species included among the salmon ) returning from the sea to spawn were forced to find alternative streams. As a consequence, their rates of straying, initially 16 percent, rose to more than 40 percent overall.
Although no one has quantified changes in the rate of straying as a result of the disturbances caused by humans, there is no reason to suspect that the effect would be qualitatively different than what was seen in the aftermath of the Mount Saint Helens eruption. Such a dramatic increase in straying from damaged areas to more pristine streams results in substantial gene flow, which can in turn lower the overall fitness of subsequent generations.
希望能帮我翻译一下标黄的那句话,我理解的意思感觉和文章要表达的意思相反啊,真心感谢~谢谢谢谢!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2013-8-14 14:26:11 | 只看该作者
人们毫无理由怀疑,人类活动队自然造成的影响同Saint Helen山的爆发的后果给自然造成的影响会存在本质上的不同。(就是说虽然没有具体数字表明人类活动对大自然的祸害程度,但是可以确定它和S爆发带来的后果不是很严重的)
板凳
发表于 2017-3-6 21:18:24 | 只看该作者
楼上有误:
应是:没什么理由怀疑,人类活动造成的影响和MMMMM火山事件中(由于自然火山爆发),有任何不同
即:人类活动对生态多样化造成的影响,也是很严重的。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-12-3 03:13
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部