ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1007|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

CR : PRESS SECRETARY 难题

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-1-5 11:36:00 | 只看该作者

CR : PRESS SECRETARY 难题

Press Secretary: 
Our critics claim that the President’s recent highway project
cancellations demonstrate a vindictive desire to punish legislative districts
controlled by opposition parties.  They
offer as evidence the fact that 90 percent of the projects canceled were in
such districts.  But all of the canceled
projects had been identified as wasteful in a report written by respected
nonpartisan auditors.  So the President’s
choice was clearly motivated by sound budgetary policy, not partisan politics。


Which of the following is an assumption on which the
press secretary’s argument depends?

The scheduled highway projects identified as wasteful in
the report were not mostly projects in districts controlled by the President’s
party.

为什么选这个答案?

谢谢了

沙发
发表于 2009-1-5 12:53:00 | 只看该作者
提示: 该帖被管理员或版主屏蔽
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2009-1-5 19:47:00 | 只看该作者
题目问的是假设前提,不是削弱。

还是不太明白,请大家帮助!

地板
 楼主| 发表于 2009-1-5 20:17:00 | 只看该作者
提示: 该帖被管理员或版主屏蔽
5#
发表于 2009-1-5 21:06:00 | 只看该作者
提示: 该帖被管理员或版主屏蔽
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-1-6 09:44:00 | 只看该作者
建议 hi_alie  耐心 耐心 看四楼解释 
7#
发表于 2009-1-14 11:56:00 | 只看该作者
没错
这个在报告中被认为是浪费的高速公路项目不属于总统党控制地区大部分的项目(总统党控制地区大部分的项目是不浪费的项目,)
整个 assumption就是说了一个前提:即  该项目是个浪费型的项目
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-7-20 18:42
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部