求拍issue22 后天考试，还是超时

peddy

22) Claim: The best way to understand thecharacter of a society is to examine the character of the men and women thatthe society chooses as its heroes or its role models.
Reason: Heroes and role models reveal asociety's highest ideals.
Write a response in which you discuss theextent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on whichthat claim is based.

===============================================================================

The main point of the issue is that whetheror not character of a society can be properly represented by the character ofits heroes and role models. I, according to the following discussion, hold theview that, though heroes reveal a society's highest ideals, we cannot try tounderstand character of a society simply by examining its heroes. On one hand,overly emphasizing on a particular individual can undoubtedly causes anincomplete understanding. On the other hand, it is apparently true that much ofthe character of a hero cannot accurately indicate a society as a whole.

First of all, it is commonsense that wetend to use one or two words to primarily understand a character of a society,and correspondingly, if a hero of such society has the same character describedby that words, it should be a good choice to let the hero represent the wholesociety. However, character of a hero usually seems to be more impressive thanthat of a common citizen, so it would be possible that we may overestimate aparticular character of a society thanks to the impressive one of the hero. Theoverestimation may cause a misunderstanding of ones who did not know thesociety at first. Finally the disadvantages may cause more problems or evensome unnecessary conflicts. On the other point of view, some other alternativemethod such as observation and statistical analysis may be better ways to helpus to understand a particular society.

Secondly, examining the heroes of a societycould not be a reliable way, though I concede that it is an effective way tomake a primary understanding of a society. Consequently, I deeply knowopponents abound, arguing that there should not be any measure more direct thanexamining the heroes. Although observation and scientific surveys may be sometimeslack of effectiveness, we nevertheless can never ignore the fact that thosescientific methods provide more reliable understanding of a particular society.Since simply knowing a society should not be our final goal, there must be somecooperation or competition with the mentioned society. Scientific methods giveus cogent information of the character of the society, making us confident inthe communications around the corner.

Least but not the least, to further analysethe disadvantages of overestimating, let's set Yao, the famous basketballplayer, as an example. According to a recent survey conducted by 'New YorkTimes', among all the 1000 Chinese participants of the investigation, who wereasked that whether or not Yao is a hero of your country and that if he can actas a man who represent all the character of China, approximately 85 percent ofthe participants agree that Yao is a hero of China, and roughly 77 percent ofthe majority do not allow him as an exemplar of China. Further research showthat, generally speaking, the representatives of the survey do not think thatYao have all merits of Chinese, though they concede that Yao is impressive inhis humility and humor, which are exactly what Chinese proud of.

In a nutshell, whether or not character ofa society can be properly represented by the character of its heroes and rolemodels is still a complex problem that any solution raised by individual isundoubtedly partial and incomplete. However, the analysis mentioned in thearticle still provides an alternative idea in solving the problem.

peddy

还是超时怎么办，issue就没有不超时过，请问构思几分钟，开头结尾写几分钟，中间三段几分钟才比较科学合理！求详细解答，快愁死了。

peddy

45分钟才写完

竹林中人

构思大概三分钟，中间核心内容22分钟，开头结尾两分钟，另外3分钟留着检查

peddy

非常感谢！！竹林大哥的帮助下今天作文写得巨顺无比！！我觉得argument都冲着600字去了。哎不过verbal成绩还是特别差。。第二次考了，还是只有146. 又找代报报了9月的考试。。我有几个问题想请教你。

首先我现在明确自己的问题有两点：
1.就是单词量，红宝只有前一半能认识90%，后面20个list只看过一遍，基本都不认得了。。
2.阅读速度慢，还老回看，而且不知道怎么改善，做36套平均21-22分钟吧，平均错两三个，到考试因为最后没时间，每个section最后几个题都基本上是胡选，前面也因为一直关注时间非常紧张。我平时做绿皮填空还有36套平均都能到10错3，到考场就考成这样了。。


我现在很困惑有两点：
1.我36套、绿皮填空都做了两遍了，总结应该会比较有意义，怎么总结效果比较好呢；另外用他俩练肯定没意义了，除了他俩有什么与真题相似度很高的题可以用于平时计时检测水平呢？
2.因为9.21应该就是我最后一次机会考GRE了而且基本没有别的选择了，而我TOEFL也在9.23考试，之后一个月怎么分配时间才能两个都兼顾呢。


谢谢给我解答这么繁杂的问题！
我之前用pp模考barron 模考四套都是153以上...一到考场紧张的很，考这样只能还得赖在CD一个月。。真心祝CD越来越壮大！