ChaseDream

标题: feifei-65 [打印本页]

作者: 小女公子    时间: 2005-3-17 22:04
标题: feifei-65

According to advertisements, the higher a suntan lotion’s sun protection factor, or SPE, the more protection from sunburn. In order for a suntan lotion to work, however, one has to remember to put it on before going in the sun, put on an adequate amount to cover the skin, and reapply it as needed. Therefore, it really does not matter what SPE a suntan lotion has.



Which one of the following best identifies the error in reasoning made in the passage?



A.        It is unreasonable to assume that the only purpose of a suntan lotion is to provide protection from sunburn.


B.        Because some people get sunburned more easily than other, the fact that there are different SPEs cannot be ignored.


C.        It cannot be concluded that the SPEs is not important just because there are requirements for the application of the suntan lotion.


D.       It is unreasonable to assume that all suntan lotions required the same application procedures in order to work effectively.


E.        There is no reason to assume that manufacturers are unaware that people sometimes forget to apply suntan lotion before going in the sun.





想再确定一下这道题的思路,



逻辑简图,防晒霜和spe都可以防晒。Spe含在防晒霜里。因为有反复涂抹防晒霜已经可以防晒了,所以,spe的效果就不用加以考虑了。错误—〉spe可能有其他效果。


Am I right??




作者: lawyer_1    时间: 2005-3-20 07:10

原文意思:防晒霜的护肤成分SPE越高,护肤效果越好。防晒霜如何用。所以防晒霜含的SPE不重要。

逻辑错误是:C






欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3