ChaseDream

标题: [求助]GWD-11-7 阅读里的一道逻辑题 [打印本页]
作者: 菁菁    时间: 2005-3-17 14:31
标题: [求助]GWD-11-7 阅读里的一道逻辑题

  According to a theory advanced



       by researcher Paul Martin, the wave


       of species extinctions that occurred


Line       in North America about 11,000 years


  (5)      ago, at the end of the Pleistocene era,


can be directly attributed to the arrival


of humans, i.e., the Paleoindians, who


were ancestors of modern Native


Americans.  However, anthropologist


(10)      Shepard Krech points out that large


animal species vanished even in areas


where there is no evidence to demon-


strate that Paleoindians hunted them.


Nor were extinctions confined to large


(15)      animals:  small animals, plants, and


insects disappeared, presumably not


all through human consumption.  Krech


also contradicts Martin’s exclusion of


climatic change as an explanation by


(20)      asserting that widespread climatic


       change did indeed occur at the end of


       the Pleistocene.  Still, Krech attributes


secondary if not primary responsibility


for the extinctions to the Paleoindians,


(25)      arguing that humans have produced


local extinctions elsewhere.  But,


according to historian Richard White,


even the attribution of secondary


responsibility may not be supported


(30)      by the evidence.  White observes that


Martin’s thesis depends on coinciding


dates for the arrival of humans and the


       decline of large animal species, and


Krech, though aware that the dates


(35)      are controversial, does not challenge


them; yet recent archaeological


discoveries are providing evidence


that the date of human arrival was


much earlier than 11,000 years ago.



Q7:


Which of the following, if true, would most weaken Krech’s objections to Martin’s theory?


              



  1. Further studies showing that the climatic change that occurred at the end of the Pleistocene era was even more severe and widespread than was previously believed

  2. New discoveries indicating that Paleoindians made use of the small animals, plants, and insects that became extinct

  3. Additional evidence indicating that widespread climatic change occurred not only at the end of the Pleistocene era but also in previous and subsequent eras

  4. Researchers’ discoveries that many more species became extinct in North America at the end of the Pleistocene era than was previously believed

  5. New discoveries establishing that both the arrival of humans in North America and the wave of Pleistocene extinctions took place much earlier than 11,000 years ago

答案B


请问，这题中的C选项是否也有削弱的作用呢？如果在物种消失以前就有这种天气的变更，那“由天气变更引起物种灭绝”的假设就有问题了啊。我的想法有问题吗？


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-3-17 14:36:29编辑过]
作者: swimmingfrog    时间: 2005-3-18 07:48

题目问的是weaken Krech’对Martin的反对。

K的观点是：contradicts Martin’s exclusion of  climatic change as an explanation asserting that widespread climati change did indeed occur at the end of the Pleistocene.

也就是说M 认为climatic change did not occur .

K认为M不应该排除(exclusion )环境曾发生过巨大变化的可能性。所以B选项是加强而不是削弱K的观点

作者: 菁菁    时间: 2005-3-18 22:44

现在想想，C也不象是支持，倒象是无关选项。既不能支持“M考虑过气候变化带来物种灭绝的可能”也不能削弱这个哦。所以只能选B啦，能直接WEAKEN K对M的反对，对不对？

作者: luxing    时间: 2005-6-4 15:27

我支持C！！





欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3