标题: 求教大牛lawyer逻辑分类一道题 [打印本页] 作者: yongqiang2742 时间: 2015-4-8 22:40 标题: 求教大牛lawyer逻辑分类一道题 One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare it with other companies. This technique, commonly called “benchmarking,” permits the manager of a company to discover better industrial practices and can provide a justification for the
adoption of good practices.
Any of the following, if true, is a valid reason for benchmarking the performance of a company against companies with which it is not in competition rather than against competitors EXCEPT:
(A) Comparisons with competitors are most likely to focus on practices that the manager making the comparisons already employs.
(B) Getting “inside” information about the unique practices of competitors is particularly difficult.
(C) Since companies that compete with each other are likely to have comparable levels of efficiency, only benchmarking against noncompetitors is likely to reveal practices that would aid in beating competitors.
(D) Managers are generally more receptive to new ideas that they find outside their own industry.
(E) Much of the success of good companies is due to their adoption of practices that take
advantage of the special circumstances of their products or markets.
lawyer给的答案是B，但我觉得应该选E，有大牛来解释下吗？ 作者: sonicsnake 时间: 2015-4-9 10:51
这题算逻辑里的难题了，因为题干写的很恶心，N重否定加粘连句式最后还来个except
CDE都在说benchmarking的好，排除，剩下AB，A说Comparisons with competitors，跟题干里的which it is not in competition冲突，排除作者: alzn2765 时间: 2015-5-22 15:57
这道题的答案就是E啊！