ChaseDream

标题: og 161 [打印本页]

作者: 小女公子    时间: 2005-3-8 15:12
标题: og 161
OG 161

161. A wildlife expert predicts that the reintroduction of the caribou into northern Minnesota would fail if the density of the timber wolf population in that region is more numerous than one wolf for every 39 square miles.



(A) would fail if the density of the timber wolf population in that region is more numerous than



(B) would fail provided the density of the timber wolf population in that region is more than



(C) should fail if the timber wolf density in that region was greater than



(D) will fail if the density of the timber wolf population in that region is greater thanD



(E) will fail if the timber wolf density in that region were more numerous than



D, the best choice, uses a correct sequence of present and future indicative verb forms—predicts, will fail, and is—in the three related clauses. Density, an abstract “mass” noun, is logically construed with greater than. In A and B, would fail disagrees with the other verbs in tense and mood. Choice A misconstrues density with more numerous than, and B uses the pretentious and illogical word provided for if in a conditional clause after a negative idea (would fail). C’s should fail and was are confusing and inconsistent with predicts. C and E use the absurd phrase timber wolf density. (The wolves are not dense; their population is dense.) E also uses an inconsistent subjunctive form, were, and misconstrues density with more numerous than.


tense肯定是不一致的,但问题是怎么mood也不对了呢??would在这里暗示了什么语气??谢谢!!


作者: colacat    时间: 2005-3-8 15:14
虚拟语气
作者: 小女公子    时间: 2005-3-9 11:52

thanks *_^

jiayou






欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3