ChaseDream

标题: 求牛人解答:Prep08-204 [打印本页]

作者: cynthia7x    时间: 2015-3-17 11:10
标题: 求牛人解答:Prep08-204
New York City ordinance of 1897 regulated the use of bicycles, mandated a maximum speed of eight miles an hour, required of cyclists to keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars at all times, and it granted pedestrians right-of-way.
A, regulated the use of bicycles, mandated a maximum speed of eight miles an hour, required of cyclists to keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars at all times, and it granted
B, regulated the use of bicycles, mandated a maximum speed of eight miles an hour, required cyclists to keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars at all times, granting
C, regulating the use of bicycles mandated a maximum speed of eight miles an hour, required cyclists that they keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars at all times, and it granted
D, regulating the use of bicycles, mandating a maximum speed of eight miles an hour, requiring of cyclists that they keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars at all times, and granted
E, regulating the use of bicycles mandated a maximum speed of eight miles an hour, required cyclists to keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars at all times, and granted


正确答案:E
求问:如果表示法令法规的ordinance后面内容需要加ing形式的话,那么为什么此处只有regulate加了,而后面几个动词都是-ed形式,我觉得mandate\require\grant都可以算是内容啊,为什么用的ed形式
或者这样理解,如果用ing形式整个句子就缺少谓语了?法令法规的ing只能在定语成分的时候用一下?
求牛人解答!
作者: xiuyiwei1    时间: 2015-3-17 14:38
应该是regulating做定语修饰ordinance,然后后面谓语mandated, required, and granted平行吧
作者: benjaminsandro    时间: 2015-3-18 14:18
楼上说的没错
细看每个动词,mandated, required,和granted是规定的分项内容。regulate显然不是一个层次,是ordinace的目的/结果,所以从意义上说不适合放在一起平行。
具体到做题,可以用平行结构和主谓来选出正确答案。
regulating是现在分词做定语,修饰前面紧邻的ordinance。




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3