ChaseDream

标题: 补充练习又一提 [打印本页]

作者: pyndick    时间: 2003-7-27 17:51
标题: 补充练习又一提
during her lecture the speaker used map to clarify directional terms, (for not everyone in attendance was knowledgeable) that winds are designated by the direction from which they come.
B for everyone in attendance did not know
E for not everyone attending knew
What is wrong with B?
“in attendance” is unidiomatic? Or “everyone … not…” is not the same as “not everyone”




作者: joywzy    时间: 2003-7-27 18:44
1) E是部分否定,要用NOT。。。DO

2)动词>名词
作者: jubel    时间: 2003-7-27 18:58
我觉得全部否定和部分否定都不影响逻辑,不过动词>名词决定了E优于B
作者: jubel    时间: 2003-7-27 18:59
不过好像这种题目里一般是选部分否定的。
作者: pyndick    时间: 2003-7-27 21:57
以下是引用jubel在2003-7-27 18:59:00的发言:
不过好像这种题目里一般是选部分否定的。


但以前我学的两者都是部分否定,只有none才是全部否定

动词〉名词?
动词〉形容词?
这是规则?
作者: tocean0222    时间: 2003-7-27 22:35
"in attandence" produces redundency and is not idiomatic as well.




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3