ChaseDream

标题: 问feifei-11 [打印本页]

作者: greatvampire 时间: 2005-2-20 18:13
标题: 问feifei-11
读题目有困难望指点

作者: greatvampire 时间: 2005-2-20 18:22

简化后应该是the switch left those growers no better off than if none of them had switched
就是说这种变换不会让更换作物种植者比不更换过得好
意思就是不提倡更换是吧

作者: greatvampire 时间: 2005-2-20 18:24

然后说这个conclusion是unwarranted
那么就是提倡更换了
那么……

作者: greatvampire 时间: 2005-2-20 18:26
大概自己分析出来了~不过还是感觉头蒙蒙的

作者: 携隐 时间: 2005-2-21 13:17

兄弟，首先feifei题目请发到LSAT逻辑区，其次请把题目贴出来并在标题中按照标准格式注明题号，否则不会有人作答。标准格式如下：

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardID=24&ID=74827&page=1

作者: greatvampire 时间: 2005-2-22 11:00
谢谢刚知道这规矩抱歉

作者: greatvampire 时间: 2005-2-22 16:22
不过不是我不愿意去LSAT区那里实在是太冷清啦根本没答复啊
还是把题目贴一边希望版主可以帮帮忙
Partly because of bad weather, but also partly beacuse some major pepper growers have switeched to high-priced cocoa, world production of pepper has been running well below worldwide sales for three years. Pepper is consequently in relatively short supply. The price of pepper has soared in response: it now equals that of cocoa.

Some observers have concluded that the rise in the price of pepper means that the switch by some growers from pepper to cocoa left those growers no better off than if none of them had switched; this conclusion, however, is unwarranted because it can be inferred to be likely that

A) those growers could not have foreseen how high the price of pepper would go
B) the initial cost involved in switching from pepper to cocoa is substantial
C) supperlies of pepper would not be as low as they are if those growers had not switched crops
D) cocoa crops are as susceptible to being reduced by bad weather as are pepper crops
E) as more growers turn to growing cocoa, cocoa supplies will increase and the price of cocoa will fall precipitously.

请问"the switch by some growers from pepper to cocoa left those growers no better off than if none of them had switched"应该作何理解？

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)