标题: 请教两题(刘振民语法精解) [打印本页] 作者: awei1018 时间: 2003-7-26 22:05 标题: 请教两题(刘振民语法精解) E1-16 这是改为正确以后的句子. In 1933 the rubber, clothing,and shipbuilding industries put into effect a six-hour workday,not as a temporary expedient but as a seemingly permanent accommodation to what many observers thought was an economy made overproduction by advances in technology. 我没有看懂accommodation 以后的句字成分 请教是什么意思
E4-20 Although the manager agreed to a more flexible work schedule, (he said that it must be posted on the bulletin board so that both management and labor will know what everyone is) assigned to do. 正确选项A 我选了 D he said that the schedule would have to be posted on the bulletin board so that both management and labor would know what everyone was 我想知道为什么要选择a呢 d都错在什么地方? 还望详细解释一下!作者: joywzy 时间: 2003-7-27 09:59
T1, 宾补
T2，be able to 的发起人必须是有生命体，不能是schedule.作者: awei1018 时间: 2003-7-27 15:17
能不能翻译一下e1-16整句话的意思呢,我就是读到accommodation之后就有些摸不着头脑了.
joywzy:我没有看懂你的关于第二题的解释,我当初选择D的时候是出于时态的考虑作者: 小米 时间: 2003-7-27 17:26
1）。。。accommodation to what many observers thought was an economy made overproduction by advances in technology. 六小时工作制不是。。。。而是一种（许多观察家认为由于使用先进技术导致的供给过量经济）的适应 2）句子在表达一项公司的新制度时用现在时态比较好，不受主句影响。
作者: 小米 时间: 2003-7-28 11:35
第一个问题是不是这样解释更清楚些：accommodation to （what many observers thought was）（ an economy ）（made overproduction by advances in technology）.
作者: awei1018 时间: 2003-7-29 02:09
多谢小米！！ made overproduction....按你的意思是修饰economy是吗？但我觉得语法上有点不通啊 made前面为什么没有先行词that呢 what many observers thought 我觉得是一个名词性成分 作者: awei1018 时间: 2003-7-29 18:10
我的意思是accommodation 后肯定是跟一个名词性成分解释为对...的适应,可是我怎么看不出来what many...technology是一个名词性成份呢. 拆开来看what many observers thought类似于what he said这种形式应该是一个名词性成份,那后面的was做什么成份呢作者: 丑得老婆哭 时间: 2005-8-1 19:11
accomodation,此处作为协调讲最好，由accomodate意思转化过来