ChaseDream

标题: lsat-1-4-20 [打印本页]

作者: icyeye 时间: 2005-2-14 00:34
标题: lsat-1-4-20
20. Abolish taxes, and real taxpayers would find that their disposable incomes have increased. Abolish taxes, and public employees would find that their incomes have disappeared.

Which one of the following is a logical conclusion that depends on information in both of the statements above?

(E) If there were no taxes, then public employees could not be paid.（这个为什么不对呢？）

作者: chelseayang 时间: 2005-2-14 22:50
isn't it possible that the government borrow money to pay their employees when the original income is cut short?

作者: icyeye 时间: 2005-2-17 01:44

我选e是因为觉得他是paraphase.请再清楚地说明你认为e不对的原因

作者: flyingceleste 时间: 2005-2-17 23:27

{if no taxes----》public employees could not be paid.} doesn‘t meant that taxes is the only way that public employees are paid by ，so，that’s why I think E is wrong

(E) If there were no taxes, then public employees could not be paid.

作者: Pudding 时间: 2005-2-21 17:15

My two cents:

我猜可能是因為題目問的是:a logical conclusion that depends on information in both of the statements above

如果選E的話, 只要第二句話就夠用了, 第一句話用不上... 忽然想到這有點像數學的DS, 呵呵...

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)