verbal我尽量回忆~~
【作文！！】中了一篇不是很看得懂的。光上去就手抖了.
太好了~~我找到原题了~~
The following appeared in a letter from a part-owner of a small retail clothing chain to her business partner:
“Commercial real estate prices have been rising steadily in the Sandida Heights neighborhood for several years, while the prices in the adjacent neighborhood of Palm Grove have remained the same. It seems obvious, then, that a retail space in Sandida Heights must now be much more expensive than a similar space in Palm Grove, which was not the case several years ago. So, it appears that retail spaces in Sandida Heights are now overpriced relative to those in Palm Grove. Therefore, it would be in our financial interest to purchase a retail space in Palm Grove rather than in Sandida Heights.”
1. Gratuitous assumption：
(the real estate price in Sadida Heights have been ring while then prices in Palm Grove have remained unchanged in not sufficient to reach the conclusion that a retail space in Sandida Heights is not much more expensive than a similar in Plam Grove )
2) 错误因果关系
( more expensive, caused the retail spaces are now overpriced)也许因为P城是 underpriced 呢?
3) Gratuitous assumption：
因为价格低， 所以买P 城， 这个也许不是个好主意， 其他竞争对手也有同样的想法， P城的竞争压力大。
给个XDF的思路。 参考思路 1. Gratuitous assumption：the real estate price in Sadida Heights have been ring while then prices in Palm Grove have remained unchanged in not sufficient to reach the conclusion that a retail space in Sandida Heights is not much more expensive than a similar in Plam Grove.
2. 错误因果: more expensive, caused the retail spaces are now overpriced)也许因为P城是 underpriced 呢
3. Gratuitous assumption：因为价格低， 所以买P城， 这个也许不是个好主意， 其他竞争对手也有同样的想法， P城的竞争压力大。
4. 因为S的房子原价比较低，而P的房子原价比较高，所以.虽然S的房子一直在涨价，但是还是比P便宜
5. 就算S的房子比P 的房子价格高，但是S是繁华的大都市，P只是个鸟不拉屎的小山村，S的房价比P高完全合理，不存在任何高估，甚至S的房价还是被低估了
6. 就算S的房价被高估了，但是人们买房子考虑的因素很多，不仅仅是价格， S的房子相对P有很多其他优点，所以很多人宁愿买S的房子。
7. S的价格高了，就一定没有financial benifits了吗? 因为S的价格在上涨中，这个反倒说明购买S地的能带来利益。为了更好地评价financial interest， 我们应该知道S地门店价格的趋势，两地的商业利益的比较。
