ChaseDream

标题: 刷OG刷出来个新疑问，路过进来瞧瞧。OG13Q43新问题 [打印本页]

作者: Satanilles 时间: 2014-11-28 13:48
标题: 刷OG刷出来个新疑问，路过进来瞧瞧。OG13Q43新问题

43. Laos has a land area about the same as Great Britain but only four million in population, where many are members of hill tribes ensconced in the virtually inaccessible mountain valleys of the north.

A about the same as Great Britain but only four million in population, where many
B of about the same size as Great Britain is, but in Laos there is a population of only four million, and many
C that is about the same size as Great Britain's land area, but in Laos with a population of only four million people, many of them
D comparable to the size of Great Britain, but only four million in population, and many
E comparable to that of Great Britain but a population of only four million people, many of whom

关于BD选项，我能理解为一个句子连续两个连词么？
复习的时候突然想到的，这个能作为排除点么？
一个句子没说完，然后“comma+conj+句子+comma+conj+句子+句号”，这样算错么？因为感觉遇到的都是一个连词，然后加上从句或者是结构之类的。很少看到连续补充两个连词的（一个句号内）。

只是想法，勿拍砖，请指点

作者: yatina 时间: 2014-11-28 14:09
楼主，个人愚见：
从语法角度，用连词把小句子连在一起构成一个大句子是常见且正确的，这题不能用这个排除，例如昨天阅读小分队里遇到这样一句话：
“Once you’re on Facebook and Twitter and Foursquare and Google Plus and Tumblr and LinkedIn and Instagram and Reddit and Path — when, exactly, do you have time left over for a life?”
例子略为不恰当，虽然是连接了单词，但这N个and不能算错吧？一句话里既有并列又有转折很正常。

作者: Satanilles 时间: 2014-11-28 14:37

yatina 发表于 2014-11-28 14:09
楼主，个人愚见：
从语法角度，用连词把小句子连在一起构成一个大句子是常见且正确的，这题不能用这个 ...

谢谢回复~我明白啦

语法题和阅读题里的句子不能用一个标准判断吧
好吧我只是觉得这样不是很恰当，但是按照简洁放在最后的原则，确实不构成排除的理由。还是首先看语法上的问题吧。

作者: yatina 时间: 2014-11-28 14:42
楼主说的对，确实不能用一个标准来判断，做语法还是要根据句子意思来判断。

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)