ChaseDream

标题: GWD-TN23-Q2详细解释=外加一个平行的小问题~ [打印本页]

作者: sunyuwei 时间: 2014-10-17 15:36
标题: GWD-TN23-Q2详细解释=外加一个平行的小问题~

Unlike many United States cities, where a river is no longer the focal point of urban life, the river in San Antonio winds through the middle of the business district, and the River Walk, or Pasco del Rio, is the city's most popular attraction.

A. Unlike many United States cities, where a river is no longer the focal point of urban life, the river in San Antonio

B. Unlike the river in many cities in the United Stated, which is no longer the local point of urban life, in San Antonio the river

C. Today the river in many cities in the United States is no longer the focal point of urban life, unlike San Antonio, where it

D. In few United States cities today, a river is the focal point of urban life, but the river in San Antonio

E.No longer do many cities in United States have a river as the focal point of urban life, but in San Antonio the river

这道题的答案是E，有一个很好的解释如下：

choice a:

faulty comparison:

'unlike many u.s. cities, ... the river in san antonio...' --> can't compare cities to a river

choice b:

comparison isn't so good:

the second part should start directly with 'the river' (instead of 'in san antonio the river...'), so that the comparison is more clear.

much more importantly, poor use of the relative pronoun 'which':

'...cities in the united states, which is no longer the focal point...'

relative pronouns like which, by default, refer to the noun that's closest to the left, which in this case is the united states. therefore, this relative pronoun is used in a way that's either ambiguous (if you allow it to potentially refer to other nouns) or just plain wrong (if you follow the rule strictly).

choice c:

faulty comparison again

'the river...' is being compared to san antonio.

choice d:

drastic change in meaning

this sentence has completely gotten rid of any reference to the concept of 'no longer'. while all the other sentences say that things have changed, this sentence presents the situation as if it's always been that way.

但是我有一个平行并列的问题：由and but or for nor yet 连词连接的分句不用要求平行并列吗？如E中，难道but in 之前不需要一个并列的结构存在吗？谢谢解答~

作者: sunyuwei 时间: 2014-10-17 22:22
ddddddddddd

作者: willingyue 时间: 2015-3-21 10:48
我选的B为什么不对啊。。

作者: sunyuwei 时间: 2015-3-21 18:18

willingyue 发表于 2015-3-21 10:48
我选的B为什么不对啊。。

comparison isn't so good:
the second part should start directly with 'the river' (instead of 'in san antonio the river...'), so that the comparison is more clear.
much more importantly, poor use of the relative pronoun 'which':
'...cities in the united states, which is no longer the focal point...'
relative pronouns like which, by default, refer to the noun that's closest to the left, which in this case is the united states. therefore, this relative pronoun is used in a way that's either ambiguous (if you allow it to potentially refer to other nouns) or just plain wrong (if you follow the rule strictly).

作者: 2643301345 时间: 2015-3-21 21:21
D 为什么错，我还是没明白。

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)