ChaseDream
标题: GMAT OG第90题求解 [打印本页]
作者: lainemai 时间: 2014-10-10 16:37
标题: GMAT OG第90题求解
A new law gives ownership of patents—documents providing exclusive right to make and sell an invention—to universities, not the government, when those patents result from government-sponsored university research. Administrators at Logos University plan to sell any patents they acquire to corporations in order to fund programs to improve undergraduate teaching.
Which of the following, if true, would cast most doubt on the viability of the college administrators’ plan described above?
(A) Profit-making corporations interested in developing products based on patents held by universities are likely to try to serve as exclusive sponsors of ongoing university research projects.
(B) Corporate sponsors of research in university facilities are entitled to tax credits under new federal tax-code guidelines.
(C) Research scientists at Logos University have few or no teaching responsibilities and participate little if at all in the undergraduate programs in their field.
(D) Government-sponsored research conducted at Logos University for the most part duplicates research already completed by several profit-making corporations.(D)
(E) Logos University is unlikely to attract corporate sponsorship of its scientific research.
这道题我两次看两次错,逻辑链是这样的:
Fact 1:一个新的法律赋予学校专利的所有权-文件提供专有权利去制造和销售发明物,当这些专利是来自于公立大学研究
Fact 2: 在L大学的管理者打算向公司销售他们拥有的任何专利权去募集资金发展本科教学
因果模式推理:
CQ1:因果概括问题(原文的因和果没有联系或一因有多果)
CQ2:干扰因素(原文的前提加上选项就不一定有结果了)
这种模式需要抓住前提,将选项扔到前提和结论之间即可
本题属于CQ2,即加上正确选项就未必有结果
那么除掉正确选项D,我一直觉得E是没有问题的,结论讲的是L大学想要出售他们的任何专利权去募集资金,那么这个结论的FLAW就在于他们募不募集得到资金,所以个人觉得E也是正确的,虽然OG上说Plan concerns selling patents resulting from government-sponsored resresearch ,但是我觉得结论的重点是在于募集资金这块,所以我觉得E也没有不对的地方~~求大NN解答~~~谢谢哦~~~~
作者: patricialiu 时间: 2014-10-13 10:55
关于E,我觉得LU的plan是向cooperate出售patents以便fund for teaching,而不是为scientific research来raise fund. 所以E与结论无关。而且从题干可以看出这些是government-sponsered reserach.
作者: lainemai 时间: 2014-10-13 15:23
patricialiu 发表于 2014-10-13 10:55
关于E,我觉得LU的plan是向cooperate出售patents以便fund for teaching,而不是为scientific research来rai ...
后来又看了一遍题才懂,发现确实遗漏了government-sponsor这个条件~谢谢
作者: 林佳音 时间: 2021-1-8 15:55
感谢分享!
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) |
Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |