ChaseDream

标题: OG 13 55题有点小疑问 求NN解答下 [打印本页]

作者: sunyuwei    时间: 2014-9-16 18:05
标题: OG 13 55题有点小疑问 求NN解答下
Many house builders offer rent-to-buy programs that enable a family with insufficient savings for a conventional down payment to be able to move into new housing and to apply part of the rent to a purchase later.
(A) programs that enable a family with insufficient savings for a conventional down payment to be able to move into new housing and to apply
(B) programs that enable a family with insufficient savings for a conventional down payment to move into new housing and to apply
(C) programs; that enables a family with insufficient savings for a conventional down payment to move into new housing, to apply
(D) programs, which enables a family with insufficient savings for a conventional down payment to move into new housing, applying
(E) programs, which enable a family with insufficient savings for a conventional down payment to be able to move into new housing, applying

1.OG的解释是:
C Insofar as this is grammatical, using a
semicolon here causes that to refer too
broadly to the entire previous clause rather
than specifically to programs
; the two
infi nitives should be joined by the
conjunction and, not separated by a comma.
这是什么语法点,希望有大牛解释下
2.此处的applying 的错误点是不是因为他的逻辑主语可以是builder且逻辑含义说的通,因此有歧义而排除?


作者: sunyuwei    时间: 2014-9-16 21:00
顶。。。。。。。。。。。
作者: 暴躁的大叔    时间: 2014-9-16 22:30
第一点你可以看一下曼哈顿的逗号,分号,冒号,破折号的详述。

第二点是comma+Ving的用法,这个点资料很多,就是做状语,表伴随或者目的,这里都不行。
作者: sunyuwei    时间: 2014-9-17 10:29
sunyuwei 发表于 2014-9-16 21:00
顶。。。。。。。。。。。

我认为这里可以表示伴随啊




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3