标题: OG 13-29 关于Ron对V-ing的解释的疑问 [打印本页] 作者: PhoenixPenn 时间: 2014-9-15 03:10 标题: OG 13-29 关于Ron对V-ing的解释的疑问 OG-13 29:
Emily Dickinson's letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and ending shortly before Emily's death in 1886. outnumbering her letters to anyone else.
(A) Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and ending shortly before Emily's death in 1886, outnumbering
(B) Dickinson were written over a period that begins a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and ended shortly before Emily's death in 1886, outnumber
(C) Dickinson, written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and that ends shortly before Emily's death in 1886 and outnumbering
(D) Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother, ending shortly before Emily's death in 1886, and outnumbering
(E) Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and ending shortly before Emily's death in 1886, outnumber
"the phrase in question, "outnumbering ...", is NOT, in any way whatsoever, a "(direct/indirect) result" of the time period over which the letters were written.
作者: ZZP无敌 时间: 2014-9-15 11:07
偶认为不是比较period和outnumber, 而是在说明were written in blahblahbla...period 和outnumber的关系,也就是verb和modifier",outnumbering"的关系。
Manhattan上说,present participles with commas,作为verb modifiers may apply both the verb and the verb's subject.而隔了这么老长一段废话,outnumbering貌似在修饰废话Period, ron的意识是这个废话和outnumber没有关系,所以outnumbering不是在修饰were..writen in什么period, 却给人这种感觉,是整个句意非常不clear.
其实我觉得还是以看OG的解释为主,gmat 想考的就是express effectively and correctly.也就是学术英语写作,在语法正确的基础上最重要的就是让人看懂你要表达什么,也就是语义。og说的这个句子就是想说,一个人给她某亲戚写的信最多,而不是他什么时候写的,所以最重要的意思放在最重要的位置也就是谓语上表达得就更为清晰。所以抓一个句子大势所趋,培养OG语感很重要,细枝末节的地方太过计较浪费时间最后搞的心情都不愉悦了。GMAC就是想挑选出具有能抓住大势的这种BUSINESS LEADER的人,所以有这样的能力就能取得高分,也就是“大礼不辞小让”之道。这是我的理解,希望对你有帮助a~~~作者: ashlyzhu 时间: 2014-9-15 21:45
个人觉得:逗号加ving结构一、做伴随(ving和主句谓语同时发生)或者结果(主句导致ving),这两种中,ving和主句肯定有关系的,二此道题目,在XX时间,XX信被写了和信的数量超过其他信的数量有毛关系,如果说,谁谁天天写信,导致了信的数量大增。
二、作定语结构,可以做主句定语,有一道题说:XXis one of ...,training several generations of actors whose ranks include...大致结构是这样,这里的training修饰的就是主语。 从prep笔迹上:因为主系表结构不能够被伴随,所以ving结构只剩下作定语的功能,又因为主系表结构,那么可以说是ving结构既主语又修饰表语。
这是我的理解,希望对你有帮助了作者: PhoenixPenn 时间: 2014-9-16 05:48
ZZP无敌 发表于 2014-9-15 11:07
偶认为不是比较period和outnumber, 而是在说明were written in blahblahbla...period 和outnumber的关系, ...
嗯嗯,谢谢!我也明白大势为主,结合句意为王,不过有时候强迫症发作了挡都挡不住呀,嘿嘿~
小哥提到“present participles with commas,作为verb modifiers may apply both the verb and the verb's subject.”
这意思就是,ing不止能修饰主语,还能修饰谓语么?那就复杂了…作者: PhoenixPenn 时间: 2014-9-16 06:21
对的,曼哈顿是这样的观点,这个观点运用正好可以运用在这道题。不过并不复杂,因为要么修饰谓语,要么修饰主语两种情况,outnumber修饰谓语显然不可以,written in ..period和outnumber显然没有关系,然而主语离outnumber非常远,感觉像是outnumber在修饰written in ..period。所以不clear。这是我的想法,仅供参考~作者: ashlyzhu 时间: 2014-9-16 09:45
PhoenixPenn 发表于 2014-9-16 06:21
谢谢Ashly大神!
研究了下,还有一点点不明白:我之前总结的笔记(当然可能有错)写的是
我是这样理解PREP笔记的:因为主系表结构:主语 is 表语,那么主语和表语其实是一个东西 ,所以修饰主语就是表语了,
但我觉得还是修饰主语吧,读起来语义通顺就行,作者: ashlyzhu 时间: 2014-9-16 09:51
我记得有一个句子这样说的:because a single tree, depending on its size and XX, is able to V....
这里的depending on就不能理解为修饰主语做主语定语,不然读起来很奇怪:依靠他的尺寸的数干了XX事儿。
是修饰后面的动词的,潜在含义有正因为这样的尺寸,才能干了XX事儿。
但是有的时候,这种格式可以说是修饰主语作定语,一切就看句子语义了。
希望有帮助了作者: PhoenixPenn 时间: 2014-9-17 02:32