ChaseDream

标题: GWD的一道语法题望大神讲解谢谢 [打印本页]

作者: sunyuwei 时间: 2014-9-12 17:21
标题: GWD的一道语法题望大神讲解谢谢

Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidential campaign of 1992, a greater proportion than it was in any previous election.

A. a greater proportion than it was

B. a greater proportion than

C. a greater proportion than they have been

D. which is greater than was so

E. which is greater than it has been

A. It这里不能指代一句话，指代错误；

B. 正确；原句补充完整：Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidential campaign of 1992, a greater proportion than the proportion television costs had accounted for the spending in any previous election;

C. they have been中的been与之前的accounted不对应，直接改成were就好；they指代错误；指代同B中还原后的正确句子；现在完成时使用错误，in any previous election说明应用过去完成时;

D. Which不能指代前面的词语；

E. Which不能指代前面的词语；it指代不清。

后面的讲解我总觉得有问题，望大神讲解一下？in any previous election说明应用过去完成时？

作者: sunyuwei 时间: 2014-9-14 10:28
顶。。。。。。。。。。。

作者: 言熙樾 时间: 2014-9-14 12:40
因为主句是accounted for过去时， in any previous election-->过去的过去故而过去完成时

作者: sunyuwei 时间: 2014-9-14 13:11

言熙樾发表于 2014-9-14 12:40
因为主句是accounted for过去时， in any previous election-->过去的过去故而过去完成时 ...

所以不是因为in any previous election 这个短语本身用过去完成时而是因为主句里的提示。。。恍然大悟了...
其实整个句子是省略了 television costs accounted for more than half the spending这部分，那C呢所说的were 是什么意思

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)