ChaseDream

标题: sc问题求大神解答~~ [打印本页]

作者: 裘球球    时间: 2014-9-11 15:15
标题: sc问题求大神解答~~
2.Bluegrass musician Bill Monroe, whose repertory, views on musical collaboration, and vocal style were influential on generations of bluegrass artists, was also an inspiration to many musicians, that included Elvis Presley and Jerry Garcia, whose music differed significantly from his own.

(A) were influential on generations of bluegrass artists, was also an inspiration to many musicians, that included Elvis Presley and Jerry Garcia, whose music differed significantly from
(B) influenced generations of bluegrass artists, also inspired many musicians, including Elvis Presley and Jerry Garcia, whose music differed significantly from
(C) was influential to generations of bluegrass artists, was also inspirational to many musicians, that included Elvis Presley and Jerry Garcia, whose music was different significantly in comparison to
(D) was influential to generations of bluegrass artists, also inspired many musicians, who included Elvis Presley and Jerry Garcia, the music of whom differed significantly when compared to
(E) were an influence on generations of bluegrass artists, was also an inspiration to many musicians, including Elvis Presley and Jerry Garcia, whose music was significantly different from that of


请问 many musicians, including Elvis Presley and Jerry Garcia与 many musicians, that included Elvis Presley and Jerry Garcia有什么区别吗

作者: bigfatwhiterabb    时间: 2014-9-11 15:34
musicians是人,不能用that修饰的,用who。
作者: 裘球球    时间: 2014-9-11 15:53
bigfatwhiterabb 发表于 2014-9-11 15:34
musicians是人,不能用that修饰的,用who。

关系代词指人时,如果是限定性定语从句可以用that代替who吧?
比如:he is the man that i saw yesterday

但如果是非限定性定语从句不能用that:像文中的例子 many musicians, that included Elvis Presley and Jerry Garcia,是这样吗?
作者: 裘球球    时间: 2014-9-11 15:54
白先勇的语法书上说 that included Elvis Presley and Jerry Garcia就近musicians, musicians  that included Elvis Presley and Jerry Garcia 是逻辑意思不合理    是什么意思哦
作者: 裘球球    时间: 2014-9-11 16:32
顶顶、、、、、、
作者: bigfatwhiterabb    时间: 2014-9-11 17:38
裘球球 发表于 2014-9-11 15:53
关系代词指人时,如果是限定性定语从句可以用that代替who吧?
比如:he is the man that i saw yesterday ...

白勇的分析是指that include XXX可以理解成musicians包含Ep和JG,物理范围上包含,就像人身体里包含各种器官一样。这样逻辑上就不对了。而including可以排除这种歧义。
作者: bigfatwhiterabb    时间: 2014-9-11 17:59
裘球球 发表于 2014-9-11 15:53
关系代词指人时,如果是限定性定语从句可以用that代替who吧?
比如:he is the man that i saw yesterday ...


jlucero       
Post subject: Re: SC - As a result of the medical advances Post Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 2:22 pm
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 1122       
thanghnvn wrote:
Thank you Manhantan experts, pls, confirm the following

"that" relative pronoun on gmat is not used to refer to persons, "who" is used.

Yup.

----
上面是曼哈顿论坛上有人提问that指代人的问题,instructor的回答。没法贴截图,所以我复制了下,有点乱。平常英语里用that指代人没问题的。尽量还是用who,whom吧。
作者: 裘球球    时间: 2014-9-12 15:25
bigfatwhiterabb 发表于 2014-9-11 17:38
白勇的分析是指that include XXX可以理解成musicians包含Ep和JG,物理范围上包含,就像人身体里包含各种 ...

谢谢你的回答!我想问:
include强调“包括成员中的某些”
比如The list included his name. 这个名单上包括他的名字。
My family include my father, my mother and I.

musicians included ep and jg 为什么有歧义呢,,,,,,

作者: 裘球球    时间: 2014-9-12 15:28
裘球球 发表于 2014-9-12 15:25
谢谢你的回答!我想问:
include强调“包括成员中的某些”
比如The list included his name. 这个名单上 ...

many musicians, including Elvis Presley and Jerry Garcia     在这里including Elvis Presley and Jerry Garcia做musicians 的定语吗还是作整个句子的伴随结果状语?
作者: bigfatwhiterabb    时间: 2014-9-12 17:38
裘球球 发表于 2014-9-12 15:28
many musicians, including Elvis Presley and Jerry Garcia     在这里including Elvis Presley and Je ...

including不同于别的ving,including有介词的属性。
作者: bigfatwhiterabb    时间: 2014-9-12 18:28
裘球球 发表于 2014-9-12 15:25
谢谢你的回答!我想问:
include强调“包括成员中的某些”
比如The list included his name. 这个名单上 ...

你说的这些例子从逻辑上都是可以排除的,father不可能是family这种概念的物理上的一部分,所以include是包含的意思。但是musicians是人,物理上有身体,有手有脚之类的。我觉得还是我们不习惯英语的思维,去问老外,老外就会反应:不能用include啊,用include读起来怪怪的。但是我们说汉语的就体会不了哪里奇怪了。我们先入为主的就认为that include中include是概念上的包含,而不是物理上的。
作者: 裘球球    时间: 2014-9-12 19:07
bigfatwhiterabb 发表于 2014-9-12 17:38
including不同于别的ving,including有介词的属性。

谢谢!理解了include的用法,可是including 不是include的现在分词吗
作者: bigfatwhiterabb    时间: 2014-9-14 23:18
裘球球 发表于 2014-9-12 19:07
谢谢!理解了include的用法,可是including 不是include的现在分词吗

ron说过、including特殊。当介词使用。
作者: 裘球球    时间: 2014-9-16 10:02
bigfatwhiterabb 发表于 2014-9-14 23:18
ron说过、including特殊。当介词使用。

谢谢你,解开了疑惑!




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3