ChaseDream

标题: 请教大神关于 comma+and 其主语的问题 [打印本页]

作者: jeswenjes 时间: 2014-9-1 19:37
标题: 请教大神关于 comma+and 其主语的问题
Manhattan语法p.197 中说 “Do not use a comma before and to separate two verbs that have the same subject”.
由此知识点分析OG13-SC No.91

In an effort to reduce their inventories, Italian vintners have cut prices; their wines have been priced to sell, and they are.

Ahave been priced to sell, and they are
Bare priced to sell, and they have
Care priced to sell, and they do
Dare being priced to sell, and have
Ehad been priced to sell, and they have
正确选项C. their wines are priced to sell, and they do. (they是指wines, 但按照Manhattan的知识点来看，两个并列句子的主语都是wines，不应该用 comma + and分开，这样理解对吗？
而且看到网上其他大神说 “此题利用comma+and 可以判断they指wine而非vintner，若指vintner就可以省去comma+and ” 对这个实在不理解啊，有大神帮忙解释一下吗？
我想知道关于comma+and 主语的问题（什么时候必须去掉，若两句是同一个主语还可以用comma and分隔么，是不是必须要不相同的主语），不是讨论they的指代.... 想了一个多小时，不知道表达清楚没有，希望得到CD大神们和G友的解答~~先谢过大家！

作者: perrylkt 时间: 2014-9-1 20:11
亲还没搞懂they指代的是谁，这边they明显是vintners，do是重复之前的sell

作者: ChenLuAda 时间: 2014-9-1 22:49
我觉得they指wines,they do是个句子用comma+and.Actually, it's not "separate verbs",but" separate two sentences", although these two sentences have the same subjuects.

作者: elleven806 时间: 2014-9-2 00:36

ChenLuAda 发表于 2014-9-1 22:49
我觉得they指wines,they do是个句子用comma+and.Actually, it's not "separate verbs",but" separate two s ...

同意2L they是指代vintners
一个句子里面相同代词指代同一对象
只有they是指代vintners
their wine 他们的酒
如果they也指代酒，那就是指代错误

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)