ChaseDream

标题: PREP [打印本页]

作者: lainemai 时间: 2014-8-27 11:14
标题: PREP
The thirteen original British colonies in North America, some formed as commercial ventures, others as religious havens, each had a written charter that set forth its form of government and the rights of the colonists.
A.       some formed as commercial ventures, others as religious havens, each had a written charter
B.       some being formed as a commercial venture, others as religious havens, all of which had written charters
C.       some that formed as commercial ventures, others as religious havens, all had written charters
D.       with some being formed as a commercial venture, others as religious havens, all had a written charter
E.       with some formed as commercial ventures, while others as religious havens, each had a written charter
这道题选A，CHASEDREAM2008语法笔记里，编号190（附件已上传便于牛牛参考），对D选项的解释有些疑惑，除去后面all和为划线的句子its有冲突外，我还想知道为什么它的解释是：由于前面主句是主系表结构，with并不是引导独立主格这句话。主句哪里是主系表结构了？Each had a written charter.....根本就是主谓宾啊。。。求解难道我理解句子有错？
而且解释还说with的存在使得some并不是指代colonies,而是colonies所相关的东西，为什么会有指代其他东西的嫌疑？with已经紧紧跟在被修饰词后了还会有这样的歧义吗？

作者: richtung 时间: 2014-8-27 12:31
我觉得这里不应该是独立主格结构，正确句子的some others是同位语。

with结构比较好理解，其实我也蛮晕comma+with和with+phrase+comma结构的，一起讨论。
with在句子中的作用就是状语和定语嘛，这里不可能是状语，状语是不修饰名词的，所以这里用with只是能是做定语，但是从这个讨论里面看，comma+with是不能做定语修饰名词的，comma+with以及with phrase+comma都是修饰main clause。（是那个TIM这么确认的，Ron似乎没有正面回答）。

http://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/in-1988-the-council-on-economic-priorities-began-publishing-t5735-30.html

作者: lainemai 时间: 2014-8-27 15:11

richtung 发表于 2014-8-27 12:31
我觉得这里不应该是独立主格结构，正确句子的some others是同位语。

with结构比较好理解，其实我也蛮晕com ...

啊我有点明白了，经你这么一提醒，确实A是同位语结构呢。但是with这个结构被排除的理由，我还是不是很清楚PREP语法笔记里说是因为前面是主系表结构，但是我压根没看出来

作者: lainemai 时间: 2014-8-27 15:27

richtung 发表于 2014-8-27 12:31
我觉得这里不应该是独立主格结构，正确句子的some others是同位语。

with结构比较好理解，其实我也蛮晕com ...

http://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/thirteen-colonies-t7407.html
感觉这里已经有所解释了

作者: Sara.Z 时间: 2018-8-24 05:07
看后半段中有 "its"就可以对端前面一定是用each, 所以排除 b,c,d.
E中while改变句意，排除。
所以选A

作者: kluivert 时间: 2018-8-24 06:24
引用Ron的解释

(e) is wrong for a couple of reasons.
* first of all, "with" wrongly suggests that "some" refers not to the colonies themselves but to something that the colonies came with. to suggest that you're referring to the colonies themselves (which you are), you need modifiers of the type used in the correct answer (a).
* "while" MUST be used with a clause or __ing phrase. it can't be used with a construction that doesn't contain any sort of verb form (such as this one, which is just noun + prepositional phrase).

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)