ChaseDream

标题: PREP O8 RC 71题求助！！！ [打印本页]

作者: AmberJian 时间: 2014-8-14 09:00
标题: PREP O8 RC 71题求助！！！
In order to improve the long-term savings rate of its citizens, Levaska’s government has decided to introduce special savings accounts. Citizens can save up to $3,000 a year in special accounts without having to pay tax on the interest, unless they withdraw money from the account before they reach the age of sixty-five. If they do withdraw any money before that age, they have to pay tax on the accumulated interest and a penalty.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously threatens the success of the government’s plan?
A. The banks and financial institutions where the special accounts will be held lobbied hard for their introduction.
B. Nearly all workers in Levaska can already save money in tax-free accounts through their workplace.
C. For the past ten years, Levaskans have been depositing an ever smaller percentage of their income in long-term savings.
D. Many Levaskans continue to work beyond the age of sixty-five.
E. In certain circumstances, such as a serious illness, the government plans to waive the penalty on early withdrawals from the special accounts.

这道题为什么是因果模式推理呢？我是理解成方案了。。。然后答案涉及到方案可行性的问题。。。。看了以前关于这道题的解释贴也没有很懂希望有nn可以再帮我解释一下！！！万分感谢！！！

作者: mercury01 时间: 2014-8-14 10:44

方案 (PP 08-1#78)

因果 (PP 08-2#71)

To improve the long-term savings rate of the citizens of Levaska, the country's legislature decided to implement a plan that allows investors to save up to $1,000 per year in special accounts without paying taxes on the interest earned unless withdrawals are made before the investor reaches age sixty-five. Withdrawals from these accounts prior to age sixty-five would result in the investor's having to pay taxes on all the accumulated interest at the time of withdrawal.

In order to improve the long-term savings rate of its citizens, Levaska’s government has decided to introduce special savings accounts. Citizens can save up to $3,000 a year in special accounts without having to pay tax on the interest, unless they withdraw money from the account before they reach the age of sixty-five. If they do withdraw any money before that age, they have to pay tax on the accumulated interest and a penalty.

不曉得跟讀句意的精確程度有沒有關係, 希望有大牛可以解議一下, 怎樣是論證過或是評估過的...

作者: AmberJian 时间: 2014-8-14 12:49

mercury01 发表于 2014-8-14 10:44
不曉得跟讀句意的精確程度有沒有關係, 希望有大牛可以解議一下, 怎樣是論證過或是評估過的...
...

你是单纯根据文章的用词确定的吗？这样对比的话确实能看出来差别，不过单独出的话就怕分不清啊。。。

作者: mercury01 时间: 2014-8-14 18:27
我是經過對比, 才感覺到這樣的差別, 不過有時候如果沒注意到, 推理模式就會判斷錯誤.
我原本的想法是 has decided => 已經評估過了或是論證過了...
不知道想法對不對~

作者: mercury01 时间: 2014-8-15 00:11
補充一下:

左邊的Argument決定方案要執行, 但是沒有說明方案執行後的結果, 包含下面藍色文字都僅是在說明方案執行的內容.
右邊has decided用完成式, 所以這個方案全部都被評估了, 下面藍色文字, 則是說明沒有遵照這個方案, 會產生的結果.

總結, 方案和因果的分類, 除了觀察有無評估方案的敘述, 或許注意一下時態或語氣也可以用來判斷...

作者: AmberJian 时间: 2014-8-15 08:25

mercury01 发表于 2014-8-14 18:27
我是經過對比, 才感覺到這樣的差別, 不過有時候如果沒注意到, 推理模式就會判斷錯誤.
我原本的想法是 has d ...

谢谢！！！

作者: zzx576122628 时间: 2014-8-20 21:51
先赞一下二楼mercury01同学的对比图，我好像又体会到了一丢丢，说一下我的理解。
In order to improve the long-term savings  rate of its citizens, Levaska’s government has decided to introduce special  savings accounts. Citizens can save up to $3,000 a year in special accounts  without having to pay tax on the interest, unless they withdraw money from  the account before they reach the age of sixty-five. If they do withdraw any  money before that age, they have to pay tax on the accumulated interest and a  penalty.
假设这是个方案推理过程
方案是： introduce special  savings accounts
目的是： improve the long-term savings  rate of its citizens
我们再看蓝色部分，这部分不仅仅讲了特殊账户是什么，而且表明了当存钱的时候会有免税奖励，提前支出会有惩罚，即鼓励了人们的存款

所以我把原来的因果模式翻译一下
先把标准版po一下

前提（因）是：“特殊账户可以让公民存的长期存款在一定额度上免税，若提前支取，需要支付税费和罚款”

结论（果）是：“为了增加公民的长期存款率，政府决定引入特殊储蓄账户”

再说下理解后的白话版
前提（因）是：现在有一种真的可以鼓励人们存款的账户哦

结论（果）是：为了增加公民的长期存款率，我们就引进一下它吧

引用helr原话：“题目已经告诉了我为何这个方案可以达成这个目标，也就是解释了这个方案的优势，我还评估什么方案呢？”
补充下我的白话：我不知道这个方案能不能达到这个目的我才要评估啊，我现在知道这个方案看起来可行（真的可以鼓励存款哦），就不用评估了

作者: zzx576122628 时间: 2014-8-20 21:52

mercury01 发表于 2014-8-14 10:44
不曉得跟讀句意的精確程度有沒有關係, 希望有大牛可以解議一下, 怎樣是論證過或是評估過的...
...

忘记点回复了，关于08#71你看下是否赞同我的说法

作者: mercury01 时间: 2014-8-21 00:28

zzx576122628 发表于 2014-8-20 21:52
忘记点回复了，关于08#71你看下是否赞同我的说法

贊同你的看法, 而且最後一句是用現在式 If they do withdraw any money before that age, they have to pay tax on the accumulated interest and a penalty. 還需要評估嗎? 直接作了唄~~~

作者: zzx576122628 时间: 2014-8-21 07:35

mercury01 发表于 2014-8-21 00:28
贊同你的看法, 而且最後一句是用現在式 If they do withdraw any money before that age, they have to p ...

我有两个问题：
1.你有PP08第一部分的题？我看你写的两题分别是08-1和08-2，请问区别是？我好像没有见过你左边那一栏的题，可以发给我吗？
2.看你用繁体多问一句你是台湾or香港的同学吗？

作者: mercury01 时间: 2014-8-21 19:50
1. http://forum.chasedream.com/thread-839547-1-1.html 中間有一個 "第一部分" 是 PP 08-1 的題目.
2. 台灣學生~

作者: zhtxcg 时间: 2015-11-24 19:12
求prep08 SC

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)