ChaseDream

标题: [求助]lsat-8-2-17 [打印本页]

作者: 三脚猫    时间: 2005-1-30 17:18
标题: [求助]lsat-8-2-17

17.       Biographer: Arnold’s belief that every offer of assistance on the part of his colleagues was a disguised attempt to make him look inadequate and that no expression of congratulations on his promotion should be taken at face value may seem irrational. In fact, this belief was a consequence of his early experiences with an admired older sister who always made fun of his ambitions and achievements. In light of this explanation, therefore, Arnold’s stubborn belief that his colleagues were duplicitous emerges as clearly justified.


The flawed reasoning in the biographer’s argument is most similar to that in which one of the following?


(A) The fact that top executives generally have much larger vocabularies than do their subordinates explains why Sheldon’s belief, instilled in him during his childhood, that developing a large vocabulary is the way to get to the top in the world of business is completely justified.


(B) Emily suspected that apples are unhealthy ever since she almost choked to death while eating an apple when she was a child. Now, evidence that apples treated with certain pesticides can be health hazards shows that Emily’s long-held belief is fully justified.


(C) As a child. Joan was severely punished whenever she played with her father’s prize Siamese cat. Therefore, since this information makes her present belief that cats are not good pets completely understandable, that belief is justified.


(D) Studies show that when usually well-behaved children become irritable, they often exhibit symptoms of viral infections the next day. The suspicion, still held by many adults, that misbehavior must always be paid for is thus both explained and justified.C


(E) Sumayia’s father and mother were both concert pianists, and as a child, Sumayia knew several other people trying to make careers as musicians. Thus Sumayia’s opinion that her friend Anthony lacks the drive to be a successful pianist is undoubtedly justified.


我见到这类题就心惊胆战,有没有什么套路或方法,求NN们指教


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-1-31 23:34:22编辑过]

作者: lawyer_1    时间: 2005-1-30 22:09

1。这是LSAT-8-2-17题,请改标题。

2。碰到这类题,我一样胆战心惊。

3。该题原文推理是依据过去经验推出现在结果。选项只有C是这种推理方式。


作者: 三脚猫    时间: 2005-1-31 23:35

已改过来了,多谢!


作者: xjlv128    时间: 2006-4-19 17:07
好在GMAT不考,我很少做对这种题




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3