ChaseDream

标题: og,sc上一题,求大牛们解释,积人品 [打印本页]

作者: maggie0217    时间: 2014-7-23 13:36
标题: og,sc上一题,求大牛们解释,积人品

In 1995 Richard Stallman, a well-known critic of the patent system, testified in Patent Office hearings that, to test the system, a colleague of his had managed to win a patent for one of Kirchhoff's laws, an observation about electric current first made in 1845 and now included in virtually every textbook of elementary physics.


答案选A, 不太懂为什么, 求解释。谢谢各位大牛,祝大家杀G成功。


作者: neverland1021    时间: 2014-7-23 14:07
不是牛牛,但是我是这样来做的;
A an observation直接做 a patent的同位语解释(有些疑惑,an observation是做a patent还是做one of K law的同位语???这一点也坐等牛牛解惑。。),看横线后面的now included...是修饰an observation about electric current, and前后两个成分(made和included)逻辑和结构上都满足平行,没问题
B and it is 和前面which部分不平行,and前面是个修饰成分后面是个完整的句子
C namely出现,前后都应该是名词
D it is前面的逗号不能连接两个句子
E first made in 1845,这个把原来的essential modifer改成non-essential modifer,句子含义改变,and 后面的is 和前面的was平行,从而no include后面的部分不再修饰an  oberservation,错
作者: 吃饭睡觉打豆豆    时间: 2014-7-23 15:11
小菜豆是这么做的,
看到选项开始是个区分名词修饰语的POE
然后看看句子,这里明显是要做名词解释,因此用同位语从句最合适。
作者: maggie0217    时间: 2014-7-26 06:52
谢谢谢谢,感激
作者: DUKB24    时间: 2014-7-26 09:09
摘自我自己编写的OG13千行笔记:

关键split:subject-verb agreement;verb tense;meaning
A.        protect主谓不一致,错误
B.        正确
C.        protect主谓不一致,错误
D.        to的出现把法律规定的东西这层意思 → 变成了法律的目的,意思不合理,错误;(the law is to protect turtles,not to use the devices!)are protecting和主语单复数不一致
E.        to错误同上






欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3