ChaseDream

标题: 不好意思我又来问了，BCD我觉得都有关杀不掉 [打印本页]

作者: bunnyfdu2015 时间: 2014-7-17 23:15
标题: 不好意思我又来问了，BCD我觉得都有关杀不掉

. When storing Renaissance oil paintings, museums conform to standards that call for careful control of the surrounding temperature and humidity, with variations confined within narrow margins.Maintaining this environment is very costly, and recent research shows that even old oil paint is unaffected by wide fluctuations in temperature and humidity.Therefore, museums could relax their standards and save money without endangering their Renaissance oil paintings.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

	Renaissance paintings were created in conditions involving far greater fluctuations in temperature and humidity than those permitted by current standards.
	Under the current standards that museums use when storing Renaissance oil paintings, those paintings do not deteriorate at all.
	Museum collections typically do not contain items that are more likely to be vulnerable to fluctuations in temperature and humidity than Renaissance oil paintings.
	None of the materials in Renaissance oil paintings other than the paint are vulnerable enough to relatively wide fluctuations in temperature and humidity to cause damage to the paintings.
	Most Renaissance oil paintings are stored in museums located in regions near the regions where the paintings were created

答案D。我怎么觉得BCD都杀不掉啊，可能我晕菜了不好意思

我觉得B-也说了画不会变质啊，问题是不是出在under current standards?
C-博物馆的收藏不包括那些[比文艺复兴时期画更容易潮解的画]，这个也好像啊
D-没有...更会损坏画，也是啊

请问我哪里想的不对啊，今天状况好差，脑子不灵活T^T

作者: lsy103759 时间: 2014-7-31 14:37
B：under current standard，意思是在很严格的控制，温度湿度变化很小的条件下，画没问题。那肯定没问题啊。。。
文章要说的就是我们不花那么多钱提供严格的控制，让温度湿度范围变化大点那个画也依然挺好的。所以它现在很好并不代表温度变化大了也好

C：无关啊，文章一直在讨论文艺复兴时期的画，和别的画无关。。。
我们现在要讨论的是文艺复兴的画到底能不能被保护好的问题，即使没有比它更容易潮解的的画，这个方法有不对的话还是不能把文艺复兴的画保存好啊

D：概念范围啊。文章认为颜料不受温度湿度波动的影响，画就能保存好。画里还有别的物质啊，那如果别的物质受不了温度湿度波动，画就废了。
所有加一个假设就是没有别的物质受温度湿度波动影响。

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)