ChaseDream

标题: 请教一个must be true的CR [打印本页]

作者: bunnyfdu2015 时间: 2014-6-27 17:14
标题: 请教一个must be true的CR
The first African slaves were brought to the Americas in the early 1600s, where their labor was used primarily for agricultural and household purposes. The institution of slavery in the New World presupposes not only the existence of slaves and owners, but also a system of laws in place which recognized and protected the practice of slavery. However, laws were not enacted, for example, declaring slaves the personal property of their owners and imposing punishments upon those who aided slaves in escape, until many years later.

If the sentences in the passage above are true, then they support which one of the following statements?

选A--ignore historical fact怎么理解啊，我觉得D挺有理的呢

	A. Arguing that laws needed to be enacted recognizing and protecting the institution of slavery before the practice of slavery could have existed in the New World is to ignore historical fact.
	B. Prior to 1700, some of the Europeans who came to the New World enslaved native Indian populations.
	C. Slavery was practiced in many parts of the world before Africans were first brought to the New World as slaves.
	D. The prior existence of a supportive legal system is needed before an institutional practice can develop.
	E. One of the reasons slavery developed in the New World was the tremendous need for manual labor.

作者: brfmzbjz 时间: 2014-6-27 17:56
The institution of slaverry presupposes(预先假定) 了应该有法律系统的存在
HOWEVER 事实上并没有这种法律

A --> 认为XXX法律本应该存在，是忽略事实（正确，因为事实就是这些法律不需要存在）
D..>在slavery真正实行之前，需要相关法律系统来支持 (错误，事实已经说了，laws were not enacted）

作者: bunnyfdu2015 时间: 2014-6-27 21:58

brfmzbjz 发表于 2014-6-27 17:56
The institution of slaverry presupposes(预先假定) 了应该有法律系统的存在
HOWEVER 事实上并没有这种法 ...

谢谢大神

作者: fjsnk 时间: 2014-6-27 22:14
文中所阐述的是the institution发生在前，enact laws发生在后，说的就是一个practice在前而enact laws在后的一个史实。
A把这个史实的顺序颠倒当然就是对历史的忽视，这可以完全从题干推出
D也是把这个史实的顺序颠倒了，只不过与A不同，它没有强调ignore the history fact，可以暂且理解这个选项赞同这个顺序的颠倒，所以与题干所要表达的意思是不同的。

作者: 山贼的头头 时间: 2014-6-27 23:34
全文的逻辑是--原命题：奴隶制的建立基于两个条件一是大量的奴隶;二是维护奴隶制的法律体系。但后面一个转折否定了这个观点。因此即是A要表达的意思。而D说的是奴隶制的法律是先决条件。是原命题要表达的意思,即不含后面的转折否定。所以不对了。

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)