ChaseDream

标题: 练习中的一道CR，查证后是LSAT的原题，一起来看看吧 [打印本页]

作者: bunnyfdu2015 时间: 2014-6-26 23:28
标题: 练习中的一道CR，查证后是LSAT的原题，一起来看看吧
The significance of Monet’s work is reflected in a recent discussion of art more than it was in his own descriptions. He is, usually, considered a founding member of French impressionists. Thus, his descriptions are unlikely to do more than confirm what he thought to be true.
Which one of the following most accurately describes a questionable technique used in the argument?

	A. It cites two pieces of evidence, each of which is both questionable and unverifiable, and uses this evidence to support its conclusions.
	B. It uses the descriptions from a famous artist to support its conclusions.
	C. It attempts to establish the validity of a claim, which is otherwise unsupported, by denying the truth of the opposite of that claim.
	D. It bases a conclusion on two premises that contradict each other and minimize this contradiction by the vagueness of the terms employed.
	E. It draws conclusions about the merit of a position from evidence about the position’s source.

选E，我就剩了AE,我很low,不晓得E是什么意思T^T

作者: brfmzbjz 时间: 2014-6-28 15:05
不建议做LAST题
出题思路和GMAT有些微的差别

作者: 山贼的头头 时间: 2014-6-28 19:13
E的意思是因为他是印象派的所以他的描述就必须符合印象派别的画家对自己作品的“描述”，即他的描述只能确定他所认为是对的东西。position指代印象派。
A显然不对two pieces of evidence, each of which is both questionable and unverifiable.第一句描述的是一个事实显然不是questionable and unverifiable。

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)