ChaseDream
标题: 指代问题 [打印本页]
作者: dkswoah 时间: 2014-6-1 16:57
标题: 指代问题
In April 1997, Hillary Rodham Clinton hosted an all-day White House scientific conference on new findings that indicates a child's acquiring language, thinking, and emotional skills as an active process that may be largely completed before age three.
Athat indicates a child's acquiring language, thinking, and emotional skills as
Bthat are indicative of a child acquiring language, thinking, and emotional skills as
Cto indicate that when a child acquires language, thinking, and emotional skills, that it is
Dindicating that a child's acquisition of language, thinking, and emotional skills is
Eindicative of a child's acquisition of language, thinking, and emotional skills as
这个题选D indicating 难道指代没有歧义么 这如果是定语 可以修饰findings
要是状语 就是修饰前面 的 句子了,难道没有问题 ? 还是这种情况不表示伴随
the use of lie detectors is based on the assumption that lying produces emotional reactions in an individual that,in turn, create unconscious physiological responses.
这道题that 跳跃指代了reactions 能解释一下为什么
作者: brfmzbjz 时间: 2014-6-3 21:37
1.v-ing前面没有逗号的时候,是定语直接修饰前面紧接的名词,不存在歧义
2.that 和 which 本来就可以根据语义和逻辑,跳跃简短的修饰语,修饰核心词
emotional reactions create unconscious responses
曼哈顿语法里都有很清楚的解释
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) |
Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |