标题: GWD TN3 30题求教！多谢NN！ [打印本页] 作者: cherryfish1209 时间: 2014-5-10 18:35 标题: GWD TN3 30题求教！多谢NN！ GWD5-Q30:
Which of the following most logically completes the argument?
The irradiation of food kills bacteria and thus retards spoilage. However, it also lowers the nutritional value of many foods. For example, irradiation destroys a significant percentage of whatever vitamin B1 a food may contain. Proponents of irradiation point out that irradiation is no worse in this respect than cooking. However, this fact is either beside the point, since much irradiated food is eaten raw, or else misleading, since _______.
A many of the proponents of irradiation are food distributors who gain from food’s having a longer shelf life
B it is clear that killing bacteria that may be present on food is not the only effect that irradiation has
C cooking is usually the final step in preparing food for consumption, whereas irradiation serves to ensure a longer shelf life for perishable foods
D certain kinds of cooking are, in fact, even more destructive of vitamin B1 than carefully controlled irradiation is
E for food that is both irradiated and cooked, the reduction of vitamin B1 associated with either process individually is compounded
答案是E，可是没有明白为什么啊。。。。支持辐射防腐的人认为辐射防腐并不比煮熟防腐的方法差，然后作者反驳这个观点，可是E的意思是并没有反驳啊。。。。作者: cherryfish1209 时间: 2014-5-18 21:47
anyone can help on this? thanks so much~